首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Cooperative Advertising in Dual Channel Supply Chain System with Different Contracting Schemes
【24h】

Cooperative Advertising in Dual Channel Supply Chain System with Different Contracting Schemes

机译:不同承包方案的双渠道供应链体系中的合作广告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper deals with the efficacy of revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts in a dual-exclusive channel, in which each manufacturer announces a cooperative advertising policy, such as cost-sharing contract, revenue-sharing contract, or neither of them, to its retailer. Under such cooperative advertising schemes, two models are developed—one in which each manufacturer determines the sharing rate endogenously or exogenously under the Stackelberg game approach and the other in which each manufacturer and its exclusive retailer cooperatively determine the sharing rate under the Nash bargaining approach. Some counterintuitive findings suggest that the advertising coordination mechanism critically depends on parameters, such as the basic demand share and product substitution. Most notably, the higher sharing rate can lead the retailer’s performance to be worse, especially when the competition becomes fierce. Furthermore, the cost-sharing contract is more beneficial to the cooperative advertising mechanism than the revenue-sharing contract.
机译:本文探讨了收入分摊和成本分摊合同在双重排他性渠道中的有效性,在这种渠道中,每个制造商向其零售商宣布合作广告政策,例如成本分摊合同、收入分成合同,或两者都不这样做。在这种合作广告方案下,开发了两种模式:一种是每个制造商在Stackelberg博弈方法下内生或外生地确定共享率,另一种是每个制造商及其独家零售商在纳什讨价还价方法下合作确定共享率。一些违反直觉的发现表明,广告协调机制在很大程度上取决于参数,例如基本需求份额和产品替代。最值得注意的是,较高的分享率会导致零售商的业绩更差,尤其是在竞争变得激烈时。此外,成本分摊合同比收益分成合同更有利于合作广告机制。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号