首页> 外文期刊>fresenius environmental bulletin >PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CMIP5 MODELS FOR PRECIPITATION ANDTEMPERATURE OVER HAIHE RIVER BASIN,CHINA
【24h】

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CMIP5 MODELS FOR PRECIPITATION ANDTEMPERATURE OVER HAIHE RIVER BASIN,CHINA

机译:CMIP5模式对海河流域降水和气温的影响评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The quantitative evaluation of GCMs' performance is vital to reduce the uncertainty of regional climate change impact research.A cascade progressive-like analysis approach is applied to evaluate the five phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) models' ability by comparing the models' outputs with ground observations (i.e.,precipitation and temperature) over the Haihe River Basin from 1960 to 2004.The results show that for the chosen seventeen GCMs after preliminary screening,all models can reproduce the intra-annual characteristics of temperature and precipitation well,and show much better agreement with temperature than precipitation.However,the majority of the models tend to underestimate the annual mean temperature,with a mean underestimation of 0.34-2.82°C.For precipitation,all models overestimate the annual mean precipitation,with a mean overestimation of 11-97.The step of performance evaluation for large-scale atmospheric variables and preliminary screening of models carried out before performance evaluation for ground climate variables can reduce uncertainties from the subjective selection of model and model error between large-scale atmospheric variables (i.e.,relative humidity at 500hPa and 850hPa) and ground precipitation.Overall,the five models,namely,HadGEM2-ES,CESM1-BGC,MPI-ESM-LR,CNRM-CM5 and ACCESS1.3,are recommended as optimal choice for regional impact studies over the HRB.
机译:对GCM性能的定量评估对于降低区域气候变化影响研究的不确定性至关重要。采用级联渐进式分析方法,通过对1960—2004年海河流域地面观测(降水量和温度)的模型输出结果进行对比,评估了耦合模式比较项目(CMIP5)模式的5个阶段能力,结果表明,经过初步筛选筛选后,17个GCMs均能较好地再现温度和降水的年内特征。并且与温度的一致性比降水要好得多。然而,大多数模式倾向于低估年平均气温,平均低估了0.34-2.82°C,对于降水,所有模式都高估了年平均降水量,平均高估了11%-97%。在地面气候因子性能评价之前,先进行大尺度大气因子性能评价和模式初步筛选,可以减少大尺度大气因子(即500hPa和850hPa相对湿度)与地面降水之间的模式主观选择和模式误差的不确定性。总体而言,HadGEM2-ES、CESM1-BGC、MPI-ESM-LR、CNRM-CM5和ACCESS1.35种模型被推荐为HRB区域影响研究的最优选择。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号