首页> 外文期刊>Global public health: An international journal for research, policy and practice >Substance use policy and practice in the COVID-19 pandemic: Learning from early pandemic responses through internationally comparative field data
【24h】

Substance use policy and practice in the COVID-19 pandemic: Learning from early pandemic responses through internationally comparative field data

机译:COVID-19大流行中的物质使用政策和实践:通过国际比较现场数据从早期大流行应对中学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented naturalexperiment in drug policy, treatment delivery, and harm reduction strategies by exposing wide variation in public health infrastructures andsocial safety nets around the world. Using qualitative data includingethnographic methods, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviewswith people who use drugs (PWUD) and Delphi-method with expertsfrom field sites spanning 13 different countries, this paper comparesnational responses to substance use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Field data was collected by the Substance Use x COVID-19 (SU x COVID) Data Collaborative, an international network of socialscientists, public health scientists, and community health practitionersconvened to identify and contextualise health service delivery modelsand social protections that influence the health and wellbeing of PWUDduring COVID-19. Findings suggest that countries with stronger socialwelfare systems pre-COVID introduced durable interventions targetingstructural drivers of health. Countries with fragmented social serviceinfrastructures implemented temporary initiatives for PWUD led by nongovernmentalorganisations. The paper summarises the most successfulearly pandemic responses seen across countries and ends by calling forgreater systemic investments in social protections for PWUD, diversionaway from criminal-legal systems toward health interventions, andintegrated harm reduction, treatment and recovery supports for PWUD.
机译:COVID-19 大流行暴露了世界各地公共卫生基础设施和社会安全网的广泛差异,在药物政策、治疗提供和减少伤害策略方面创造了前所未有的自然实验。本文使用定性数据,包括人种学方法、问卷调查和对吸毒者 (PWUD) 的半结构化访谈和德尔菲法,与来自 13 个不同国家的实地考察点的专家进行了比较,比较了第一波 COVID-19 大流行期间各国对药物使用的反应。现场数据由 Substance Use x COVID- 19 (SU x COVID) Data Collaborative 收集,这是一个由社会科学家、公共卫生科学家和社区卫生从业者组成的国际网络,旨在确定影响 PWUD 健康和福祉的卫生服务提供模式和社会保护并将其置于背景中COVID-19 期间。研究结果表明,在新冠疫情之前拥有更强大社会福利体系的国家针对健康的结构性驱动因素采取了持久的干预措施。社会服务基础设施支离破碎的国家实施了由非政府组织牵头的PWUD临时举措。该文件总结了各国最成功的早期大流行应对措施,最后呼吁对PWUD的社会保护进行更大的系统性投资,从刑事法律制度转向卫生干预措施,并为PWUD提供综合的减少伤害、治疗和康复支持。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States;

    bDepartment of Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

    UCLA Center for SocialMedicine and Humanities, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United StatesCentre d’étude desmouvements sociaux (Inserm U12/76/CNRS UMR 8044/EHESS), Paris, France Baldy Center for Law and SocialPolicy, Buffalo University of Social Science, NY, USAThe University of Manchester, Manchester University,Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandMassachusetts General Hospital, Disparities Research Unit, Boston,United StatesCenter for Research and Economic Teaching, Drug Policy Program, Aguascalientes, MX, MexicoMedicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandlPopulation and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles,United StatesCenter for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles,United StatesInstitute for Advanced Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United StatesInstitute ofScience, Technology and Society, National Yang-Ming University, Hsinchu, TaiwanLaureate Institute for BrainResearch, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, United StatesNeurology and Psychiatry Department, Faculty ofMedicine, Ain Shams University, EgyptUniversity of California Los Angeles, UCLACenter for Social Medicine and Humanities, Los Angeles, United StatesUniversidad de Puerto Rico, GraduateSchool of Public Health, San Juan, Puerto RicoUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, SubstanceAbuse and Dependence Research Center, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)David Geffen School ofMedicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United StatesPsychiary, Yale University, NewHaven, United StatesHumanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United StatesMedical Anthropology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, USAAddiction Medicine, Yale University,New Haven, United StatesAnthropology, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsIndependentResearcher, Uganda Recovery, Mukono, UgandaIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Thought, Culture andHealth Institute, Isfahan, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)Social Anthropology, University of St Andrews, StAndrews, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandAndrey Rylkov Foundation for Health and SocialJustice, President, RU, Moscow, Russian FederationAnthropology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,United StatesMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UnitedKingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandCenter for Supporting Community Development Initiatives,Executive Director, Hanoi, VN, VietnamCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Overdose Response Strategy, Atlanta, UnitedStates;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Harm reduction; drug policy; COVID-19; overdose; substance use;

    机译:减少危害;药品政策;新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19);过量;物质使用;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号