...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of dermatological treatment >Mycophenolate mofetil and lichen planopilaris: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Mycophenolate mofetil and lichen planopilaris: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:Mycophenolate mofetil and lichen planopilaris: systematic review and meta-analysis

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: For severe cases of lichen planopilaris (LPP), unresponsive to first line therapy, systemic or potent agents may be required for disease control. There have been several reports of the off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with LPP or have developed adverse effects to initial agents. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to recommended Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies with >= 5 cases reporting the outcomes of MMF in LPP were pooled and a meta-analysis of proportion was performed. Case reports were excluded from analysis. Results: A total of six studies were identified and included for meta-analysis, comprising 94 LPP patients. The pooled proportion of any good response (partial or complete) was 69.2 (95 confidence interval (CI): 47.8-77). The pooled proportion of complete response was 20 (95 CI: 10.1-36.3). The pooled proportion of partial responses was 49.2 (95 CI: 30.5-63.7). Side effects occurred in 16.9 (95 CI: 17.6-33.2). of cases, which included elevated LFTs, edema, hyperlipidemia, anemia, herpes zoster infection, photosensitivity, and urinary tract infection. Conclusion: The current evidence for MMF remains limited. However, it appears to be a potential treatment option for patients with severe or recalcitrant LPP who have failed hydroxychloroquine and other immunosuppressants.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号