【24h】

Letters to the Editor

机译:Letters to the Editor

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I do not believe that the reopening of Hillside Workshops was a political one. It was a courageous and sensible step. Closing Hillside was a political move as it was all part of the previous government's policy of downgrading and downsizing KiwiRail. Also, Fonterra and Federated Farmers wanted us to buy more from China so they could sell their products there. Hillside was in the process of building mainline carriages and container wagons. This order was cut back, leaving us short of carriages. The jigs to build the new carriages were also destroyed, making it difficult to resume the programme. The Ministry of Transport is notoriously anti-rail so its recommendations should be taken with a grain of salt. Were the officials that advised the government not to reopen Hillside not the same ones who advised the previous government to buy Chinese locomotives and wagons? Perhaps it was the same advisors who recommended secondhand, unreliable Cook Strait ferries, rather than modern ferries with rail decks. They were good at saving money on rail expenditure but had unlimited taxpayer money to build highways for their trucking mates.

著录项

  • 来源
    《The New zealand railway observer》 |2022年第3期|128-129|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号