...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Online Customer Reviews of Assisted Living Communities: Association with Community, County, and State Factors
【24h】

Online Customer Reviews of Assisted Living Communities: Association with Community, County, and State Factors

机译:Online Customer Reviews of Assisted Living Communities: Association with Community, County, and State Factors

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

? 2023 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care MedicineObjectives: Online reviews provided by users of assisted living communities may offer a unique source of heretofore unexamined data. We explored online reviews as a possible source of information about these communities and examined the association between the reviews and aspects of state regulations, while controlling for assisted living, county, and state market-level factors. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Setting and Participants: Sample included 149,265 reviews for 8828 communities. Methods: Primary (eg, state regulations) and secondary (eg, Medicare Beneficiary Summary Files) data were used. County-level factors were derived from the Area Health Resource Files, and state-level factors from the integrated Public Use Microdata series. Information on state regulations was obtained from a previously compiled regulatory dataset. Average assisted living rating score, calculated as the mean of posted online reviews, was the outcome of interest, with a higher score indicating a more positive review. We used word cloud to visualize how often words appeared in 1-star and 5-star reviews. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association between online rating and a set of community, county, and state variables. Models were weighted by the number of reviews per assisted living bed. Results: Overall, 76 of communities had online reviews. We found lower odds of positive reviews in communities with greater proportions of Medicare/Medicaid residents odds ratio (OR) = 0.986; P < .001, whereas communities located in micropolitan areas (compared with urban), and those in states with more direct care worker hours (per week per bed) had greater odds of high rating (OR = 1.722; P < .001 and OR = 1.018, P < .05, respectively). Conclusions and Implications: Online reviews are increasingly common, including in long-term care. These reviews are a promising source of information about important aspects of satisfaction, particularly in care settings that lack a public reporting infrastructure. We found several significant associations between online ratings and community-level factors, suggesting these reviews may be a valuable source of information to consumers and policy makers.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号