Assessment of central cartilaginous tumor of the appendicular bone: inter-observer and intermodality agreement and comparison of diagnostic performance of CT and MRI

摘要

Background Diagnostic performance, inter-observer agreement, and intermodality agreement between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the depiction of the major distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors have not been investigated. Purpose To determine the inter-observer and intermodality agreement of CT and MRI in the evaluation of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones, and to compare their diagnostic performance. Material and Methods Two independent radiologists retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT and MRI. Inter-observer and intermodality agreement between CT and MRI in the assessment of distinguishing imaging features, including lesion size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, pathologic fracture, soft tissue extension, and peritumoral edema, were evaluated. The agreement with histopathology and the accuracy of the radiologic diagnoses made with CT and MRI were also analyzed. Results A total of 72 patients were included. CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreements with regard to size, deep endosteal scalloping, cortical expansion, cortical disruption, and soft tissue extension (ICC = 0.96-0.99, k = 0.60-0.90). However, for the evaluation of pathologic fracture, MRI showed only moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.47). Peritumoral edema showed only fair intermodality agreement (k = 0.28-0.33) and moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.46) on CT. Both CT and MRI showed excellent diagnostic performance, with high agreement with the histopathology (k = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively) and high accuracy (91.7 for both CT and MRI). Conclusion CT and MRI showed high inter-observer and intermodality agreement in the assessment of several distinguishing imaging features of central cartilaginous tumors of the appendicular bones and demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance.