...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurourology and urodynamics. >Differences between brain responses to peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, two treatments for overactive bladder
【24h】

Differences between brain responses to peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, two treatments for overactive bladder

机译:大脑对腓骨经皮电神经调控和经皮胫神经刺激的反应之间的差异,膀胱过度活动症的两种治疗方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Objectives To compare brain responses to peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation (peroneal eTNM?) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), two methods for treating overactive bladder (OAB), using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The present study was not designed to compare their clinical efficacy. Materials and Methods This study included 32 healthy adult female volunteers (average age 38.3 years (range 22?73)). Brain MRI using 3?T scanner was performed during three 8‐min blocks of alternating sequences. During each 8‐min block, the protocol alternated between sham stimulation (30?s) and rest (30?s) for 8 repeats; then peroneal eTNM? stimulation (30?s) and rest (30?s) for 8 repeats; then, TTNS stimulation (30?s) and rest (30?s) for 8 repeats. Statistical analysis was performed at the individual level with a threshold of p?=?0.05, family‐wise error (FWE)‐corrected. The resulting individual statistical maps were analyzed in group statistics using a one‐sample t‐test, p?=?0.05 threshold, false discovery rate (FDR)‐corrected. Results During peroneal eTNM?, TTNS, and sham stimulations, we recorded activation in the brainstem, bilateral posterior insula, bilateral precentral gyrus, bilateral postcentral gyrus, left transverse temporal gyrus, and right supramarginal gyrus. During both peroneal eTNM? and TTNS stimulations, but not sham stimulations, we recorded activation in the left cerebellum, right transverse temporal gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus, and right inferior frontal gyrus. Exclusively during peroneal eTNM? stimulation, we observed activation in the right cerebellum, right thalamus, bilateral basal ganglia, bilateral cingulate gyrus, right anterior insula, right central operculum, bilateral supplementary motor cortex, bilateral superior temporal gyrus, and left inferior frontal gyrus. Conclusions Peroneal eTNM?, but not TTNS, induces the activation of brain structures that were previously implicated in neural control of the of bladder filling and play an important role in the ability to cope with urgency. The therapeutic effect of peroneal eTNM? could be exerted, at least in part, at the supraspinal level of neural control.
机译:摘要 目的 比较脑对腓骨经皮电神经调控(peroneal eTNM?)和经皮胫神经刺激(TTNS)的反应,这两种治疗方法是膀胱过度活动症(OAB),使用功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)。本研究并非旨在比较它们的临床疗效。材料和方法 本研究纳入 32 名健康成年女性志愿者(平均年龄 38.3 岁(范围 22-73))。脑部MRI使用3?T 扫描仪在三个 8 分钟的交替序列块中进行。在每个 8 分钟的阻滞期间,方案在假刺激 (30?s) 和休息 (30?s) 之间交替进行 8 次重复;然后是腓骨 eTNM?刺激 (30?s) 和休息 (30?s) 重复 8 次;然后,TTNS 刺激 (30?s) 和休息 (30?s) 重复 8 次。在个体水平上进行统计分析,阈值为 p?=?0.05,家庭误差 (FWE) 校正。使用单样本 t 检验、p?=?0.05 阈值、错误发现率 (FDR) 校正在组统计中分析生成的单个统计图。结果 在腓骨eTNM?、TTNS和假刺激中,我们记录了脑干、双侧后脑岛、双侧中央前回、双侧中央后回、左颞横回和右边缘上回的激活。在腓骨eTNM期间?和TTNS刺激,但不是假刺激,我们记录了左小脑、右颞横回、右额中回和右额下回的激活。仅在腓骨 eTNM 期间?刺激下,观察到右小脑、右丘脑、双侧基底神经节、双侧扣带回、右前脑岛、右中央鳃盖、双侧辅助运动皮层、双侧颞上回和左额下回的激活。结论 腓骨eTNM?(而非TTNS)诱导脑结构的激活,这些脑结构先前与膀胱充盈的神经控制有关,在应对尿急的能力中起着重要作用。腓骨eTNM的治疗效果?至少部分作用于神经控制的脊髓上水平。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号