Single-incision needle-knife biopsy for the diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要

? 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyBackground and Aims: A histologic diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumors (SETs) is important because of the malignant potential of these lesions. The current modalities of choice, including EUS-guided FNA and biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have demonstrated suboptimal diagnostic success. Single-incision with needle-knife (SINK) biopsy has emerged as an alternative diagnostic approach to increase tissue acquisition and diagnostic success. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the technical success, diagnostic success, and adverse events of SINK biopsy. Methods: We searched multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes assessed were the technical success and diagnostic success of SINK in GI SETs. The secondary outcomes assessed were adverse events and whether immunohistochemical analysis could be successfully performed on tissue samples obtained via SINK. Results: Seven studies with a total of 219 SINK biopsy procedures were included in this meta-analysis. The technical success rate was 98.1 (95 CI, 94.9-99.3; P = .000; I2 = .0), and the diagnostic success rate was 87.9 (95 CI, 82.6-91.7; P = .000; I2 = .0). The immunohistochemical success rate was 88.3 (95 CI, 78.7-93.9; P = .000; I2 = 3.5). The rate of adverse events was 7.5 (95 CI, 4.3-12.7; P = .00; I2 = 7.2), and bleeding was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: SINK biopsy is a safe diagnostic procedure with a high technical and diagnostic success in patients with GI SET. Further randomized controlled trials and direct comparison studies are needed to validate these findings.