...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, conflict, and survival >In September 2020, the World Health Organization called for 'equitable access to COVID-19 tools' which included 'the development, production and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments and vaccines globally, while strengthening health systems'. What evidence is there of inequity of access so far in this pandemic? What is the role of national governments and of the WHO in this?
【24h】

In September 2020, the World Health Organization called for 'equitable access to COVID-19 tools' which included 'the development, production and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments and vaccines globally, while strengthening health systems'. What evidence is there of inequity of access so far in this pandemic? What is the role of national governments and of the WHO in this?

机译:In September 2020, the World Health Organization called for 'equitable access to COVID-19 tools' which included 'the development, production and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments and vaccines globally, while strengthening health systems'. What evidence is there of inequity of access so far in this pandemic? What is the role of national governments and of the WHO in this?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The inequity in access to COVID-19 health technologies is produced at every stage of the medical innovation process. From research focussed on the benefit of the richest patient; IP that prevents manufacturing scale up; excessive prices that only factor in the private sector contribution; to unregulated global procure?ment based on wealth, inequity is produced across the lifetime of a health technology.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medicine, conflict, and survival 》 |2021年第3期| 187-196| 共10页
  • 作者

    Rhiannon Osborne;

  • 作者单位

    School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号