首页> 外文期刊>Orthodontics & craniofacial research >Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers
【24h】

Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers

机译:不同当代3D打印机生产的正畸矫治器机械性能对比分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners among different commercially available 3D printing devices. Materials and Methods Five 3D printers (Ka:rv LP 550, Swinwon; “KAR”), (L120, Dazz 3D; “L12”), (MiiCraft 125, Miicraft Jena; “MIC”), (Slash 2, Uniz; “SLS”) and (Pro 95, SprintRay; “PRO”) were used to prepare orthodontic aligners with dental resin (Tera Harz TC‐85DAW, Graphy). The central incisors of each aligner were cut, prepared and evaluated in terms of Martens‐Hardness (HM), indentation‐modulus (EIT) and elastic‐index (ηIT) as per ISO14577‐1:2002. Force‐indentation curves were recorded and differences among printers were checked with generalized linear regressions (alpha=5). Results Statistically significant differences were seen for all mechanical properties (P?
机译:摘要 目的 比较不同商用3D打印设备中正畸矫治器的力学性能。材料与方法 五台3D打印机(Ka:rv LP 550,Swinwon;“KAR”)、(L120,Dazz 3D;“L12”)、(MiiCraft 125、Miicraft Jena;“MIC”)、(斜杠 2,Uniz;“SLS”)和(Pro 95,SprintRay;“PRO”)用于制备带有牙科树脂的正畸矫正器(Tera Harz TC-85DAW,Graphy)。根据 ISO14577-1:2002 对每个矫正器的中切牙进行切割、制备和评估,包括马氏硬度 (HM)、压痕模量 (EIT) 和弹性指数 (ηIT)。记录力-压痕曲线,并用广义线性回归检查打印机之间的差异 (alpha=5%)。结果 各机械性能差异均有统计学意义(P?.05),按降序排列:HM (N/mm2) 为中位数(四分位距 [IQR]):SLS 108.5 (106.0‐112.0)、L12 103.0 (102.0‐107.0)、KAR 101.5 (97.5‐103.0)、MIC 100.0 (97.5‐101.5) 和 PRO 94.0 (93.0‐96.0);EIT (MPa) 作为平均值(标准差 [SD]):SLS 2696.3 (124.7)、L12 2627.8 (73.5)、MIC 2566.2 (125.1)、KAR 2565.0 (130.2) 和 PRO 2491.2 (53.3);ηIT (%) 作为中位数 (IQR):SLS 32.8 (32.3-33.1)、L12 31.6 (30.8-32.3)、KAR 31.3 (30.9-31.9)、MIC 30.5 (29.9-31.2) 和 PRO 29.5 (29.1-30.0)。此外,液晶显示器 (LCD) 和数字光处理 (DLP) 打印机之间存在显着差异,用于 HM (P?.001)、EIT(P?=?.002) 和 ηIT (P?.001),前者的对准器比后者打印机的对准器具有更高的值。结论 在本研究的局限性下,可以得出结论,3D打印正畸矫正器的机械性能取决于所使用的3D打印机,因此,预计其临床疗效存在差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号