...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse >Common themes in early state policy responses to substance use disorder treatment during COVID-19
【24h】

Common themes in early state policy responses to substance use disorder treatment during COVID-19

机译:COVID-19期间对物质使用障碍治疗的早期国家政策反应的共同主题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Limited research has examined how states have changed policies for treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Objectives: We aimed to identify themes in state policy responses to the pandemic in the context of SUD treatment. Identifying themes in policy responses provides a framework for subsequent evaluations of the relationship between state policies and health service utilization. Methods: Between May and June 2020, we searched all Single State Agencies for Substance Abuse Services (SSA) websites for statements of SUD treatment policy responses to the pandemic. We conducted Iterative Categorization of policies for outpatient programs, opioid treatment programs, and other treatment settings to identify themes in policy responses.Results: We collected 220 documents from SSA websites from 45 states and Washington D.C. Eight specific themes emerged from our content analysis: delivery of pharmacological and non-pharmacological services, obtaining informed consent and documentation for remote services, conducting health assessments, facility operating procedures and staffing requirements, and permissible telehealth technology and billing protocols. Policy changes often mirrored federal guidance, for instance, by expanding methadone take-home options for opioid treatment programs. The extent and nature of policy changes varied across jurisdictions, including tele-health technology requirements and staffing flexibility.Conclusion: States have made significant policy changes to SUD treatment policies during COVID-19, particularly regarding telehealth and facilitation of remote care. Understanding these changes could help policymakers prioritize guidance during the pandemic and for future health crises. Impacts of policies on disparate treatment populations, including those with limited technological access, should be considered.
机译:背景:有限的研究调查了各州在 COVID-19 大流行期间如何改变物质使用障碍 (SUD) 的治疗政策。目标:我们旨在确定在SUD治疗背景下国家应对大流行的政策主题。确定政策应对措施中的主题,为随后评估国家政策与卫生服务利用之间的关系提供了一个框架。方法:在 2020 年 5 月至 6 月期间,我们搜索了所有单一国家机构的药物滥用服务 (SSA) 网站,以获取 SUD 治疗政策对大流行的反应声明。我们对门诊计划、阿片类药物治疗计划和其他治疗环境的政策进行了迭代分类,以确定政策响应中的主题。结果:我们从 45 个州和华盛顿特区的 SSA 网站收集了 220 份文件,从我们的内容分析中得出了八个具体主题:提供药理学和非药理学服务、获得远程服务的知情同意书和文件、进行健康评估、设施操作程序和人员配备要求,以及允许的远程医疗技术和计费协议。政策变化通常反映联邦指导,例如,通过扩大阿片类药物治疗计划的美沙酮带回家的选择。政策变化的程度和性质因司法管辖区而异,包括远程医疗技术要求和人员配备灵活性。结论:在 COVID-19 期间,各州对 SUD 治疗政策进行了重大政策更改,特别是在远程医疗和促进远程护理方面。了解这些变化可以帮助政策制定者在大流行期间和未来的健康危机期间确定指导的优先次序。应考虑政策对不同治疗人群的影响,包括那些技术获取有限的人群。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号