...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Prehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Prehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:Prehospital Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Objectives: To evaluate the available published evidence of the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews an Meta-Analyses guidelines. Setting: In the prehospital setting. Participants: All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational trials using pre-hospital ECPR in adult patients (>17 years). Interventions: Prehospital ECPR. Measurements and Main Results: The study authors searched Medline, Embase, and PUBMED for all RCTs and observational trials. The studies were assessed for clinical, methodologic, and statistical heterogeneity. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge. The study outcomes were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis of means or proportions as appropriate. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. Four studies were included, with a total of 222 patients receiving prehospital ECPR (mean age = 51 years 95 CI 44-57, 81 of patients were male (CI 74-87), and 60 patients had a cardiac cause for their arrest (95 CI 43-76). Overall survival at discharge was 23.4 (95 CI 15.5-33.7; I2 = 62). The pooled low-flow time was 61.1 minutes (95 CI 45.2-77.0; I2 = 97). The quality of evidence was assessed to be low, and the overall risk of bias was assessed to be serious, with confounding being the primary source of bias. Conclusion: No definitive conclusions can be made as to the efficacy of prehospital ECPR in refractory cardiac arrest. Higher quality evidence is required.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号