...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Dairy Foods >Anti-competitive conduct: the dangers of seeking exclusivity
【24h】

Anti-competitive conduct: the dangers of seeking exclusivity

机译:反竞争行为:寻求排他性的危险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Federal Court's recent $12 million penalty against a major Australian food manufacturer is a stark reminder of when the perfectly reasonable desire to protect brand and market share can tip into anti-competitive conduct. This penalty is possibly the first in a number to come, given that the ACCC has announced it will focus on exclusivity arrangements that impact competition as an enforcement priority for 2022/23. Is exclusivity always bad? No. There are many legal and legitimate reasons to negotiate exclusivity. An easy example is when using a contract manufacturer, it is common practice to include a clause that prevents the contract manufacturer from using your recipe or proprietary processes for any other customer.
机译:联邦法院最近对澳大利亚一家大型食品制造商处以1200万澳元的罚款,这清楚地提醒我们,保护品牌和市场份额的完全合理的愿望何时会演变成反竞争行为。鉴于ACCC已宣布将重点关注影响竞争的排他性安排,作为2022/23年度的执法重点,这一处罚可能是未来众多处罚中的第一次。排他性总是不好的吗?不。谈判排他性有许多合法和正当的理由。一个简单的例子是,在使用合同制造商时,通常的做法是包含一个条款,阻止合同制造商将您的配方或专有工艺用于任何其他客户。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号