...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports health >The Effect of Body Position and the Reliability of Upper Limb Arterial Occlusion Pressure Using a Handheld Doppler Ultrasound for Blood Flow Restriction Training
【24h】

The Effect of Body Position and the Reliability of Upper Limb Arterial Occlusion Pressure Using a Handheld Doppler Ultrasound for Blood Flow Restriction Training

机译:使用手持式多普勒超声进行血流限制训练的身体位置和上肢动脉闭塞压力可靠性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The precise calculation of arterial occlusive pressure is essential to accurately prescribe individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training. Arterial occlusion pressure in the lower limb varies significantly between different body positions while similar reports for the upper limb are lacking.Hypothesis: Body position has a significant effect in upper limb arterial occlusive pressure. Using cuffs with manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound can be a reliable method to determine upper limb arterial blood flow restriction.Study Design: A randomized repeated measures design. Level of Evidence: Level 3.Methods: Forty-two healthy participants (age mean ± SD = 28.1 ± 7.7 years) completed measurements in supine, seated, and standing position by 3 blinded raters. A cuff with a manual pump and a handheld acoustic ultrasound were used. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction was used to analyze differences between body positions. A within-subject coefficient of variation and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test were used to calculate reproducibility and reliability, respectively.Results: A significantly higher upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was found in seated compared with supine position (P < 0.03D and in supine compared with standing position (P < 0.031) in all raters. An ICC of 0.894 (95 CI = 0.824-0.939, P < 0.001) was found in supine, 0.973 (95 CI = 0.955-0.985, P < 0.001) in seated, and 0.984 (95 CI = 0.973-0.991, P < 0.001) in standing position. ICC for test-retest reliability was found 0.90 (95 CI = 0.814-0.946, P < 0.001), 0.873 (95 CI = 0.762-0.93, P < 0.001), and 0.858 (95 CI = 0.737-0.923, P < 0.001) in the supine, seated, and standing position, respectively.Conclusion: Upper limb arterial occlusive pressure was significantly dependent on body position. The method showed excellent interrater reliability and repeatability between different days.Clinical Relevance: Prescription of individualized pressures during blood flow restriction training requires measurement of upper limb arterial occlusive pressure in the appropriate position. The use of occlusion cuffs with a manual pump and a handheld Doppler ultrasound showed excellent reliability; however, the increased measurement error compared with the differences in arterial occlusive pressure between certain positions should be carefully considered for the clinical application of the method.
机译:背景:动脉闭塞压的精确计算对于在血流限制训练期间准确规定个体化压力至关重要。下肢动脉闭塞压在不同体位之间差异很大,而上肢的动脉闭塞压缺乏类似的报告。假设:体位对上肢动脉闭塞压有显着影响。使用带手动泵的袖带和手持式多普勒超声是确定上肢动脉血流受限的可靠方法。研究设计:随机重复测量设计。证据级别:3 级方法:42 名健康参与者(年龄平均 ± SD = 28.1 ± 7.7 岁)由 3 名盲法评分者以仰卧位、坐姿和站姿完成测量。使用带有手动泵的袖带和手持式声超声。采用Bonferroni校正的Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析体位间的差异。分别采用受试者内变异系数和类内相关系数(ICC)检验计算重现性和信度。结果:在所有评分者中,坐位与仰卧位相比,上肢动脉闭塞压显著升高(P < 0.03D),仰卧位与站立位相比(P < 0.031)。仰卧位的ICC为0.894(95%CI=0.824-0.939,P < 0.001),坐位的ICC为0.973(95%CI = 0.955-0.985,P < 0.001),坐位的ICC为0.984(95%CI=0。973-0.991,P < 0.001)处于站立位置。在仰卧位、坐姿和站姿下,重测信度的ICC分别为0.90(95%CI=0.814-0.946,P < 0.001)、0.873(95%CI=0.762-0.93,P < 0.001)和0.858(95%CI = 0.737-0.923,P < 0.001)。结论:上肢动脉闭塞压与体位有显著相关性。该方法在不同天间表现出优异的评分者间信度和重复性。临床相关性:在血流限制训练期间开具个体化压力处方需要在适当位置测量上肢动脉闭塞压。使用带有手动泵和手持式多普勒超声的闭塞袖带显示出出色的可靠性;然而,与某些位置之间的动脉闭塞压差异相比,增加的测量误差应在临床应用中仔细考虑。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号