...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis >Antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome
【24h】

Antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome

机译:Antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study aimed to explore antithrombotic strategy and its relationship with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for stroke and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in real-world clinical practice. Patients with AF at high risk for stroke complicated with CCS from China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (CAFR) were enrolled. The patients were divided into non-antithrombotic (Non-AT) group, oral anticoagulants (OAC) group, antiplatelet therapy (APT) group (aspirin or clopidogrel), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group (aspirin + clopidogrel) according to their antithrombotic strategies at baseline. The patients with OAC + single antiplatelet drug (14 cases) and OAC + dual antiplatelet therapy (7 cases) were excluded for the small sample size. The primary effectiveness outcome was the composite outcome of coronary events, thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding events. From 2011 to 2018, 25,512 patients were included in the CARF study, 769 patients with AF at high risk for stroke and CCS were enrolled in this study. After a follow-up of 47.4 +/- 25.3 months, the incidences of primary effectiveness outcome were 44.6, 25.7, 43.6, and 29.1 in the four groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidences of primary effectiveness and all-cause mortality were both significantly lower in the OAC group than in the Non-AT group, (25.7 vs. 44.6, HR 0.53, 95 CI 0.39-0.73, P < 0.001) and (14.6 vs. 38.5, HR 0.36, 95CI 0.25-0.52, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.03, 95CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.015), heart failure (HR 1.67, 95CI 1.20-2.33, P = 0.002) and OAC (HR 0.66, 95CI 0.47-0.91, P = 0.012) were independent factors for the composite outcome. There was no significant difference in major bleeding events between the four groups. OAC monotherapy significantly reduced the primary effectiveness composite outcome and all-cause mortality in the patients with AF at high risk for stroke complicated with CCS. However, there was no significant difference in major bleeding among the different antithrombotic strategies.
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号