首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Assessment of the need of a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation with the ablation index software
【24h】

Assessment of the need of a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation with the ablation index software

机译:使用消融指数软件评估肺静脉隔离后是否需要等待期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Since the widespread availability of contact-force sensing catheters, the need for a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not been reassessed. We aim to evaluate whether a waiting period is still necessary after PVI guided by the ablation Index (Al). Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation from May 2019 to February 2020. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to PVI with versus without a waiting period of 20 min. Acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection after adenosine challenge was the primary endpoint. A per-protocol analysis was designed to determine whether a strategy of dismissing the waiting period after PVI was noninferior to waiting for 20 min for identifying acute PV reconnection. PVI was guided by tailored Al values and an interlesion distance <6 mm. Results: During the enrollment period, 167 patients (56 males, mean age of 57 ± 14 years) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria - 84 patients (308 PV) in the waiting period group (Group A) and 83 patients (314 PV) in the group without a waiting period (Group B). Acute PV reconnection was identified in 3.8 (95 confidence interval Cl, 1.7-5.9) of PVs in the study group B compared to 2.9 (95 Cl, 1.0-4.8) of PVs in the Group A (p = .002 for non-inferiority). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence between groups (9.5 in Group A vs. 9.6 in Group B, hazard ratio: 1.03 95 Cl, 0.39-2.73, p = .98). Conclusion: In paroxysmal AF patients submitted to ablation, a tailored PVI guided by the Al rendered a 20-min waiting period unnecessary.
机译:目的:由于接触力传感导管的广泛使用,尚未重新评估肺静脉隔离 (PVI) 后等待期的必要性。我们旨在评估在消融指数 (Al) 的指导下,PVI 后是否仍需要等待期。方法:对 2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 2 月转诊进行阵发性心房颤动 (AF) 消融术的连续患者进行前瞻性、多中心、随机研究。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配到 PVI,等待期为 20 分钟。腺苷激发后急性肺静脉(PV)重新连接是主要终点。设计了一项符合方案的分析,以确定在 PVI 后消除等待期的策略是否不劣于等待 20 分钟来识别急性 PV 重新连接。PVI 由定制的 Al 值和病变间距 <6 mm)指导。 结果:在入组期间,167 名患者(56% 为男性,平均年龄为 57 ± 14 岁)符合研究纳入标准——等待期组(A 组)有 84 名患者(308 名 PV),无等待期组(B 组)有 83 名患者(314 名 PV)。研究组 B 中有 3.8%(95% 置信区间 [Cl],1.7%-5.9%)的 PV 出现急性 PV 重联,而 A 组的 PV 为 2.9%(95% Cl,1.0%-4.8%)(p = 0.002 表示非劣效性)。在1年的随访中,两组之间的心律失常复发率无显著差异(A组为9.5%,9.B 组为 6%,风险比:1.03 [95% Cl,0.39-2.73],p = .98)。结论:在接受消融的阵发性心房颤动患者中,在 Al 的指导下进行量身定制的 PVI 使 20 分钟的等待期变得没有必要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号