...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Care bundles to reduce unplanned extubation in critically ill children: a systematic review, critical appraisal andmeta-analysis
【24h】

Care bundles to reduce unplanned extubation in critically ill children: a systematic review, critical appraisal andmeta-analysis

机译:Care bundles to reduce unplanned extubation in critically ill children: a systematic review, critical appraisal andmeta-analysis

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To assess the current evidence for the efficacy of care bundles in reducing unplanned extubations (UEs) in critically ill children. Design Systematic review according to the Cochrane guidelines and meta-analysis using random-effects modelling. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane and SciELO databases from inception until April 2021. We conducted a quality appraisal for each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) V2.0 checklist. Main outcome The primary outcome measure was UE rates per 100 intubation days. Results We screened 10 091 records and finally included 11 studies. Six studies were pre/post-intervention studies, and five were interrupted timeseries studies. The methodological quality was 'good' in 70, and the remaining as 'fair' (30). The most frequently used implementation strategies were staff education (100), root cause analysis (100), and audit and feedback (82). Key bundle care components comprised identification of high-risk patients, endotracheal tube care and sedation protocol. Not all studies fully completed the SQUIRE V.2.0 checklist. Meta-analysis revealed a reduction in UE rate following the introduction of care bundles (rate ratio: 0.40 (95 CI: 0.19 to 0.84); p=0.02), which equates to a 60 reduction in UE rates. Conclusions We found that identifying high-risk patients, endotracheal tube care and protocol-directed sedation are core elements in care bundles for preventing UEs. However, there are several methodological gaps in the literature, including poor evaluation of adherence to bundle components. Future studies should address these gaps to strengthen their validity.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号