首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >Prognostic generalization of multi‐level CT‐dose fusion dosiomics from primary tumor and lymph node in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
【24h】

Prognostic generalization of multi‐level CT‐dose fusion dosiomics from primary tumor and lymph node in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

机译:鼻咽癌原发肿瘤和淋巴结多水平CT剂量融合组学的预后概括

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Purpose To investigate the prognostic performance of multi‐level computed tomography (CT)‐dose fusion dosiomics at the image‐, matrix‐, and feature‐levels from the gross tumor volume (GTV) at nasopharynx and the involved lymph node for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Methods Two hundred and nineteen NPC patients (175 vs. 44 for training vs. internal validation) were used to train prediction model, and 32 NPC patients were used for external validation. We first extracted CT and dose information from intratumoral nasopharynx (GTV_nx) and lymph node (GTV_nd) regions. Then, the corresponding peritumoral regions (RING_3?mm and RING_5?mm) were also considered. Thus, the individual and combination of intratumoral and peritumoral regions were as follows: GTV_nx, GTV_nd, RING_3?mm_nx, RING_3?mm_nd, RING_5?mm_nx, RING_5?mm_nd, GTV_nxnd, RING_3?mm_nxnd, RING_5?mm_nxnd, GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd, and GTV?+?RING_5?mm_nxnd. For each region, 11 models were built by combining five clinical parameters and 127 features from: (1) dose images alone; (2–7) fused dose and CT images via wavelet‐based fusion using CT weights of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, gradient transfer fusion, and guided‐filtering‐based fusion (GFF); (8) fused matrices (sumMat); (9–10) fused features derived via feature averaging (avgFea) and feature concatenation (conFea); and finally, (11) CT images alone. The concordance index (C‐index) and Kaplan–Meier curves with log‐rank test were used to assess model performance. Results The fusion models’ performance was better than single CT/dose model on both internal and external validation. Models that combined the information from both GTV_nx and GTV_nd regions outperformed the single region model. For internal validation, GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd GFF model achieved the highest C‐index both in recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and metastasis‐free survival (MFS) predictions (RFS: 0.822; MFS: 0.786). The highest C‐index in external validation set was achieved by RING_3?mm_nxnd model (RFS: 0.762; MFS: 0.719). The GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd GFF model is able to significantly separate patients into high‐risk and low‐risk groups compared to dose‐only or CT‐only models. Conclusion Fusion dosiomics model combining the primary tumor, the involved lymph node, and 3?mm peritumoral information outperformed single‐modality models for different outcome predictions, which is helpful for clinical decision‐making and the development of personalized treatment.
机译:摘要 目的 探讨鼻咽癌(NPC)患者鼻咽部大体肿瘤体积(GTV)和受累淋巴结多层次计算机断层扫描(CT)剂量融合组学在图像、基质和特征水平上的预后性能。方法 采用219例鼻咽癌患者(训练与内部验证分别为175例vs.44例)训练预测模型,32例鼻咽癌患者进行外部验证。我们首先从瘤内鼻咽(GTV_nx)和淋巴结(GTV_nd)区域提取CT和剂量信息。然后,还考虑相应的瘤周区域(RING_3?mm和RING_5?mm)。因此,瘤内和瘤周区域的个体和组合如下:GTV_nx、GTV_nd、RING_3?mm_nx、RING_3?mm_nd、RING_5?mm_nx、RING_5?mm_nd、GTV_nxnd、RING_3?mm_nxnd、RING_5?mm_nxnd、GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd 和 GTV?+?RING_5?mm_nxnd。对于每个区域,通过结合 5 个临床参数和 127 个特征构建了 11 个模型:(1) 仅剂量图像;(2-7) 使用 CT 权重 0.2、0.4、0.6 和 0.8、梯度转移融合和基于引导滤波的融合 (GFF) 通过基于小波的融合获得剂量和 CT 图像;(8)熔融矩阵(sumMat);(9–10) 通过特征平均 (avgFea) 和特征串联 (conFea) 导出的融合特征;最后,(11)仅CT图像。采用一致性指数(C-index)和Kaplan-Meier曲线进行对数秩检验,评估模型性能。结果 融合模型在内部和外部验证中均优于单一CT/剂量模型。结合来自GTV_nx和GTV_nd区域的信息的模型优于单区域模型。对于内部验证,GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd GFF模型在无复发生存期(RFS)和无转移生存期(MFS)预测中均实现了最高的C指数(RFS:0.822;MFS:0.786)。RING_3?mm_nxnd模型在外部验证集中实现了最高的C指数(RFS:0.762;MFS:0.719)。The GTV?+?RING_3?mm_nxnd与仅剂量或仅CT模型相比,GFF模型能够将患者显著分为高风险组和低风险组。结论 融合剂量组学模型结合原发肿瘤、受累淋巴结和3?mm瘤周信息,在不同预后预测方面优于单一模式模型,有助于临床决策和个体化治疗的发展。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号