...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment: An International Journal >Epistemic community in transboundary river regime: a case study in the Mekong River Commission regarding mainstream hydropower development
【24h】

Epistemic community in transboundary river regime: a case study in the Mekong River Commission regarding mainstream hydropower development

机译:Epistemic community in transboundary river regime: a case study in the Mekong River Commission regarding mainstream hydropower development

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the importance of transboundary water management, cooperation mechanisms are limited, especially in the case of Mekong River basin where environmental and social aspects are threatened by recent anthropogenic pressures like hydro-power development. Existing transboundary mechanism such as the Mekong River Commission (MRC) is challenged to facilitate the cooperation between riparian states. An epistemic community (EC) is considered to effectively influence international governance and is studied as part of transboundary river regimes. The existence of an MRC EC is part of that regime but understanding about its characteristics is yet limited. This research aims to fill in the gap by unraveling the main features of the EC in relation to hydropower development. We analyze shared causal beliefs and policy goals that developed in the EC framework of Haas applying literature review and semi-structured interviews of experts. Results show that the community experts share causal beliefs and policy goals only to a limited extent while disagreeing on many aspects. It resembles a "disciplined" or "professional" group rather than an EC. This suggests that the knowledge factor has not gained proper influence and attention in the region, resulting in incoherent policy advice leading to policymakers developing policies based on incomplete and fragmented knowledge. The role of the MRC in the decision-making process could become more relevant if it would facilitate the development of an EC. Bringing key stakeholders including policymakers and experts into a platform where policy goals and causal beliefs are facilitated to reach possible consensus is recommended. Narrowing the science-policy gap while acknowledging differences in interests and policy objectives is crucial to reach a sustainable trans-boundary management of the Mekong River given its rapid development, especially on hydropower.

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Center of Water Management and Climate Change, Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Vietnam National University - Ho Chi Minh City, 01 Marie Curie Street, VNU campus, Quarter 6, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc Dist., Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;

    Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands;

    Waterframes, Beukenhof 259, 8212EK Lelystad, NetherlandsWater Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand, Department of Environment Management, Faculty of Food and Environment Engineering, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City,Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Institute for Environment and Resources, Vietnam National University - Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Transboundary river management; Epistemic community; Mekong basin; Hydropower development;

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号