...
首页> 外文期刊>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing / >Contextualizing evidence‐based nurse‐led interventions for reducing 30‐day hospital readmissions using GRADE evidence to decision framework: A Delphi study
【24h】

Contextualizing evidence‐based nurse‐led interventions for reducing 30‐day hospital readmissions using GRADE evidence to decision framework: A Delphi study

机译:使用 GRADE 证据决策框架将循证护士主导的干预措施置于减少 30 天再入院率的背景下:一项德尔菲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background High 30‐day readmission rates increase hospital costs and negatively impact patient outcomes in many healthcare systems, including Hong Kong. Evidence‐based and local adaptable nurse‐led interventions have not been established for reducing 30‐day hospital readmissions among general medical patients in Hong Kong's public healthcare system. Aims The aim of this study was to select and refine evidence‐based nurse‐led interventions for reducing 30‐day hospital readmissions among general medical patients in Hong Kong's public healthcare system using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework. Methods Eighteen local healthcare stakeholders were recruited to carry out a two‐step process. In step 1, stakeholders were invited to prioritize nurse‐led interventions which were supported by existing evidence and suggest important combinations of different interventions. For all interventions prioritized in step 1, step 2 involved stakeholders performing a two‐round Delphi questionnaire aiming to generate consensus‐based interventions appropriate to the local context. GRADE EtD framework was applied to guide the decision‐making process, taking into account certainty of evidence, benefits and harms, resource use, equity, acceptability, and feasibility. Results Four out of eight nurse‐led interventions reached a positive consensus with percentage agreement ranging from 70.6 to 82.4. GRADE EtD criteria ratings showed that over 70 of stakeholders agreed these four interventions were probably acceptable and feasible, though the certainty of evidence was low or moderate. Half of stakeholders believed their desirable effects compared to undesirable effects were large. However, the resources required and how these nurse‐led interventions might affect health inequities when implemented were uncertain. Preliminary implementation issues included high complexity of delivering multiple nurse‐led intervention components, and challenges of coordinating different involved parties in delivering the interventions. Appropriate resource allocation and training should be provided to address these potential problems, as suggested by stakeholders. Linking Evidence to Action Using the GRADE EtD framework, four nurse‐led interventions were recommended by healthcare stakeholders as possible strategies for reducing 30‐day hospital readmissions among general medical patients in Hong Kong. To address preliminary implementation issues, nurses' role as care coordinators should also be strengthened to ensure smooth delivery of nurse‐led intervention components, and to facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration during service delivery.
机译:摘要 背景 30天的高再入院率增加了医院成本,并对包括香港在内的许多医疗系统的患者治疗效果产生了负面影响。香港公立医疗系统尚未建立循证和本地适应性护士主导的干预措施,以减少普通内科病人的30天再入院率。目的 本研究的目的是选择和完善循证护士主导的干预措施,以使用建议评估、发展和评估 (GRADE) 证据决策 (EtD) 框架,减少香港公共医疗系统中普通内科患者的 30 天再入院率。方法 招募 18 名当地医疗保健利益相关者进行两步流程。在第 1 步中,利益相关者被邀请优先考虑由现有证据支持的护士主导的干预措施,并建议不同干预措施的重要组合。对于第 1 步中优先考虑的所有干预措施,第 2 步涉及利益相关者执行两轮德尔菲问卷,旨在生成适合当地情况的基于共识的干预措施。GRADE EtD 框架用于指导决策过程,同时考虑证据质量、利弊、资源使用、公平性、可接受性和可行性。结果 8个护士主导的干预措施中有4个达到阳性共识,百分比一致率在70.6%-82.4%之间。GRADE EtD标准评级显示,超过70%的利益相关者同意这四种干预措施可能是可接受和可行的,尽管证据质量为低或中等。一半的利益攸关方认为,与不良影响相比,其期望效果很大。然而,所需的资源以及这些由护士主导的干预措施在实施时如何影响健康不平等是不确定的。初步实施问题包括提供多个护士主导的干预组件的高度复杂性,以及协调不同相关方提供干预措施的挑战。应按照利益攸关方的建议,提供适当的资源分配和培训,以解决这些潜在问题。将证据与行动联系起来 使用GRADE EtD框架,医疗保健利益相关者推荐了四种由护士主导的干预措施,作为减少香港普通内科患者30天再入院的可能策略。为了解决初步实施问题,还应加强护士作为护理协调员的角色,以确保顺利提供护士主导的干预部分,并在提供服务期间促进多学科合作。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号