首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A systematic review of empirical research in crop production
【24h】

Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A systematic review of empirical research in crop production

机译:了解智慧农业中的技术接受度:作物生产实证研究的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Smart agriculture offers the potential to analyse agricultural data at a scale not previously possible. Researchers argue that the combination of rich data and intelligent decision support has the potential to improve productivity and profitability in agriculture, whilst also improving sustainability. We argue that achieving this potential re-quires not just on technological advancement, it also requires a detailed understanding of factors that impact technology acceptance in smart agriculture. Acceptance is necessary if technical advances are to translate into real-world impact. However, technology acceptance is complex and often poorly understood. This systematic review focuses on technology acceptance in prediction and decision support systems in crop production. Major databases were searched to identify papers that formally address technology acceptance and include detailed data. 16 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Common facilitators and barriers are identified, and papers are mapping against the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. This analysis showed that constructs including perceived effectiveness are addressed frequently, but others such as opportu-nity costs and burden have received less attention. The findings suggest the necessity for greater application of formal methods and the need for standardized, domain-specific methods to support this assessment.
机译:智能农业提供了以前所未有的规模分析农业数据的潜力。研究人员认为,丰富的数据和智能决策支持的结合有可能提高农业的生产力和盈利能力,同时提高可持续性。我们认为,实现这一潜力不仅需要技术进步,还需要详细了解影响智能农业技术接受度的因素。如果技术进步要转化为现实世界的影响,接受是必要的。然而,技术接受度很复杂,而且往往知之甚少。本系统综述的重点是作物生产预测和决策支持系统中的技术接受度。检索了主要数据库,以确定正式解决技术接受问题并包含详细数据的论文。16篇论文符合纳入标准,纳入终审分析。确定了共同的促进因素和障碍,论文正在与可接受性理论框架进行映射。这项分析表明,包括感知有效性在内的结构经常被提及,但机会成本和负担等其他结构受到的关注较少。研究结果表明,有必要更多地应用形式化方法,并需要标准化的、特定领域的方法来支持这一评估。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号