首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Physical Geography >Tracking the methodological evolution of climate change projections for UK river flows
【24h】

Tracking the methodological evolution of climate change projections for UK river flows

机译:跟踪英国河流流量气候变化预测的方法演变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Much research has been carried out on the possible impacts of climate change for UK river flows. Catchment and national-scale studies since the early 1990s are here categorized into four modelling approaches: "top-down" GCM (Global Climate Model)-driven and probabilistic approaches and "bottom-up" stylised and scenario-neutral approaches. Early studies followed a stylised approach with a small number of model experiments focused on system sensitivity. GCM-driven approaches dominate since the mid-1990s and are scenario-led and "top-down", but which incur the cascade of uncertainty which results in a large amount of information that may not be conducive to decision-making. The emergence of probabilistic projections aims to incorporate probabilistic information in navigating climate model uncertainty but remained "top-down" with challenges over its practical use for water resources planning. The scenario-neutral approach has clear roots in the early stylised approach with the aim to explore plausible futures beyond climate model projections and system sensitivity. A synthesis of studies employing each approach shows that the magnitude and sign of change in different hydrological variables remain uncertain between different regions of the UK. Comparison between studies is difficult due to their methodological differences and consequently different choices along the impact modelling chain, and with a notable geographic bias in catchment selection in southeast England. Major limitations for each approach include barriers to decision-making from wide uncertainty ranges, limited consideration of high-impact outcomes, and challenges in their application in water resources planning. These challenges represent priorities for future research using new "hybrid" approaches to produce complementary information to "top down" projections within a more "bottom-up" framework. Exploratory modelling, robust decision-making and storylines are examples of new approaches that have emerged. Key to the emerging approaches identified is a need to combine different modelling approaches to tackle different sources of uncertainty according to the intended aims of individual applications.
机译:关于气候变化对英国河流流量的可能影响,已经进行了大量研究。自 1990 年代初以来的集水区和国家规模研究在这里分为四种建模方法:“自上而下”GCM(全球气候模型)驱动的概率方法以及“自下而上”程式化和情景中立的方法。早期的研究遵循程式化的方法,少量的模型实验侧重于系统灵敏度。自1990年代中期以来,全球契约机制驱动的方法占主导地位,是以情景为主导的和“自上而下”的,但会引起一连串的不确定性,导致大量信息可能不利于决策。概率预测的出现旨在将概率信息纳入气候模式的不确定性中,但仍然“自上而下”,对其在水资源规划中的实际应用存在挑战。情景中立的方法明显植根于早期的程式化方法,旨在探索气候模型预测和系统敏感性之外的合理未来。采用每种方法的研究综合表明,在英国不同地区之间,不同水文变量变化的幅度和迹象仍然不确定。由于方法学上的差异,以及因此在影响建模链上的选择不同,以及英格兰东南部集水区选择的显着地理偏差,因此很难进行比较。每种方法的主要局限性包括不确定性范围大的决策障碍、对高影响结果的有限考虑以及在水资源规划中应用的挑战。这些挑战代表了未来研究的优先事项,使用新的“混合”方法在更“自下而上”的框架内产生补充信息,以“自上而下”的预测。探索性建模、稳健的决策和故事情节是新方法的例子。所确定的新兴方法的关键是需要结合不同的建模方法,根据个别应用的预期目标处理不同的不确定性来源。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号