...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:选择性激光烧结与传统失蜡铸造的单金属顶盖:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Statement of problem. Evidence comparing the marginal and internal fit of single metal copings fabricated via selective laser sintering and conventional lost-wax casting is inadequate.Purpose. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the fit of single metal copings fabricated via selective laser sintering and lost-wax casting. Moreover, the effects of different variables on fit accuracy were determined.Material and methods. Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Wiley databases were searched electronically as well as manually. The mean absolute marginal gap, marginal gap, internal gap, axial gap, and occlusal gap values of single metal copings fabricated via selective laser sintering and lost-wax casting were statistically analyzed to determine and evaluate the factors affecting the fit accuracy (a=.05).Results. Single metal copings fabricated via selective laser sintering had mean absolute marginal gaps and occlusal gaps similar to those of copings fabricated via lost-wax casting, based on a subgroup meta-analysis of gaps evaluated using stereomicroscopy (P>.05). The fit of single metal copings was not affected by the type of tooth (P>.05). The conventional impression, the indirect digital scan, and the direct digital scan led to similar values of mean axial gap, internal gap, and marginal gap for the copings fabricated via lost-wax casting (P>.05). The indirect and direct digital scans led to similar values of mean axial gap, internal gap, and marginal gap for the copings fabricated via selective laser sintering (P>.05). Printed wax patterns provided significantly smaller mean axial gap values than milled plastic or milled wax patterns for the copings fabricated via lost-wax casting (P.05). For single copings fabricated via lost-wax casting, Ni-Cr and Co-Cr had similar mean internal gaps (P>.05).Conclusions. No statistically significant differences were found between single metal copings fabricated via selective laser sintering and lost-wax casting. Selective laser sintering can satisfy the clinical requirement for single metal copings. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:897-904)
机译:问题陈述。比较通过选择性激光烧结和传统失蜡铸造制造的单金属顶盖的边缘和内部配合的证据不足。目的。本系统综述的目的是比较通过选择性激光烧结和失蜡铸造制造的单金属套管的拟合度。此外,还确定了不同变量对拟合精度的影响。材料和方法。Google Scholar、ScienceDirect、SpringerLink 和 Wiley 数据库以电子和手动方式进行检索。对选择性激光烧结和失蜡铸造制备的单金属顶盖的平均绝对边缘间隙、边缘间隙、内部间隙、轴向间隙和咬合间隙值进行统计分析,确定和评价影响拟合精度的因素(a=.05)。结果。根据对立体显微镜评估间隙的亚组荟萃分析,通过选择性激光烧结制造的单金属顶盖的平均绝对边缘间隙和咬合间隙与通过失蜡铸造制造的顶盖相似(P>.05)。单金属顶盖的贴合度不受齿型的影响(P>.05)。传统印模、间接数字扫描和直接数字扫描导致失蜡铸造成型件的平均轴向间隙、内部间隙和边缘间隙值相似(P>.05)。间接和直接数字扫描导致通过选择性激光烧结制备的顶盖的平均轴向间隙、内部间隙和边缘间隙值相似(P>.05)。对于通过失蜡铸造制造的顶盖,印刷蜡模提供的平均轴向间隙值明显小于铣削塑料或铣削蜡模(P.05)。对于失蜡铸造的单顶盖,Ni-Cr和Co-Cr具有相似的平均内部间隙(P>.05)。结论。通过选择性激光烧结和失蜡铸造制造的单个金属顶盖之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。选择性激光烧结可以满足临床对单一金属的处理要求。(J 假肢凹痕 2022;128:897-904)

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号