首页> 外文期刊>international journal of mycobacteriology >Dominant marker (inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction) versus codominant marker (RLEP-polymerase chain reaction) for laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: A comparative evaluation
【24h】

Dominant marker (inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction) versus codominant marker (RLEP-polymerase chain reaction) for laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: A comparative evaluation

机译:用于麻风病实验室诊断的显性标志物(简单序列间重复聚合酶链反应)与共显性标志物(RLEP-聚合酶链反应)的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Leprosy is a contagious disease and was eliminated globally in 2002. Since then, new cases were continuously detected from different parts of the world. Untreated leprosy cases shed millions of bacteria and are the main cause of dissemination of the disease. Currently, leprosy is detected by acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy and has a low sensitivity ranging from 10 to 50. The correlation between clinical findings and microscopy is unable to provide a conclusive case detection. Thus, in the present study, we compared to molecular methods, namely RLEP-polymerase chain reaction (RLEP-PCR) and inter-simple sequence repeat-PCR (ISSR-PCR) taking AFB microscopy as a gold standard for the detection of leprosy. Methods: A total of 168 clinically diagnosed leprosy patients were recruited in this study including 58 multibacillary and 110 paucibacillary patients. Slit-skin smear samples were taken for both microscopy and molecular study. Primers for RLEP-PCR were taken from the previous reports. The primers for ISSR-PCR were designed by screening the whole genome of Mycobacterium leprae TN strain (GenBank accession AL450380) for the presence of simple sequence repeats. One primer (TA) 8 CA 3 was synthesized and used for molecular amplification of ISSR-PCR. Results: We found that the efficacy of the AFB microscopy was 24.40, whereas the efficacy of RLEP-PCR and ISSR-PCR was 63.09 and 73.21 (P = 0.000, 0.000, and 0.469), respectively. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve for the comparison of three diagnostic methods was 0.845. An enhancement of 48.81 in the case detection rate by ISSR-PCR over AFB microscopy and 10.12 over RLEP-PCR was also found. Our study clearly reveals that ISSR-PCR is a better tool for diagnosis of leprosy than AFB microscopy and RLEP-PCR. Interestingly, both the PCR techniques RLEP-PCR and ISSR-PCR are able to detect samples which were negative for AFB microscopy. Conclusion: Thus, the demonstration of ISSR-PCR in SSS samples can provide a better sensitive and confirmative tool for early diagnosis of leprosy.
机译:背景:麻风病是一种传染性疾病,于2002年在全球被消灭。从那时起,世界各地不断发现新病例。未经治疗的麻风病病例会散落数百万个细菌,是该疾病传播的主要原因。目前,麻风病是通过抗酸杆菌 (AFB) 显微镜检测的,敏感性较低,范围为 10% 至 50%。临床表现与显微镜检查之间的相关性无法提供确凿的病例检测。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了分子方法,即 RLEP-聚合酶链反应 (RLEP-PCR) 和简单序列间重复 PCR (ISSR-PCR),将 AFB 显微镜作为检测麻风病的金标准。方法:共纳入临床诊断的麻风病患者168例,其中多杆菌58例,少杆菌110例。采集狭缝皮肤涂片样本进行显微镜检查和分子研究。RLEP-PCR的引物取自以前的报告。通过筛选麻风分枝杆菌TN菌株(GenBank登录AL450380)的全基因组,以发现是否存在简单的序列重复序列,设计了ISSR-PCR的引物。合成了1个引物(TA)8 CA 3,用于ISSR-PCR的分子扩增。结果:AFB显微镜的有效率为24.40%,而RLEP-PCR和ISSR-PCR的有效率分别为63.09%和73.21%(P = 0.000、0.000和0.469)。3种诊断方法比较的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积为0.845。与AFB显微镜相比,ISSR-PCR的病例检出率提高了48.81%,与RLEP-PCR相比提高了10.12%。我们的研究清楚地表明,ISSR-PCR是比AFB显微镜和RLEP-PCR更好的麻风病诊断工具。有趣的是,PCR技术RLEP-PCR和ISSR-PCR都能够检测AFB显微镜阴性的样本。结论:因此,在SSS样本中展示ISSR-PCR可以为麻风病的早期诊断提供更好的灵敏和确证工具。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号