首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures
【24h】

Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures

机译:Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study compared surgeon cervical (C) spine postures and repetitive motions when performing traditional manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA) versus robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA). Surgeons wore motion trackers on T3 vertebra and the occiput anatomical landmarks to obtain postural and repetitive motion data during MTKA and RATKA performed on cadavers. We assessed (1) flexion–extension at T3 and the occiput anatomical landmarks, (2) range of motion (ROM) as the percentage of time in the flexion–extension angle, (3) repetition rate, defined as the number of the times T3 and the occiput flexion-extension angle exceeded ±10°; and (4) static posture, where T3 or occiput postures exceed 10° for more than 30 seconds. The average T3 flexion–extension angle for MTKA cases was 5-degree larger than for RATKA cases (19?±?8 vs. 14?±?8 degrees). The surgeons who performed MTKA cases spent 15% more time in nonneutral C-spine ROM than those who performed RATKA cases (78?±?25 vs. 63?±?36%, p?

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号