...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory
【24h】

Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory

机译:使用 Dempster Shafer 理论进行机器学习、多标准决策分析和集成的洪水敏感性映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Floods are one of the most widespread natural hazards occurring across the globe. The main objective of this study was to produce flood susceptibility maps for the province of Salzburg, Austria, using two multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models including analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) and two machine learning (ML) models including random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). Additionally, we compare which of the MCDA and ML models are better suited for flood susceptibility and evaluate the use of Dempster Shafer Theory (DST) for optimising the resulting flood susceptibility maps based on eleven flood conditioning factors: elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), geology, rainfall, land cover, distance to roads and distance to drainage. The accuracy evaluation of the flood susceptibility maps through the AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) method along with the relative flood density (R-Index) shows that RF (AUC =87.8) and SVM (AUC =87) outperform the ANP (AUC =86.6) and AHP (AUC =85.9) models. Therefore, the predictive performance of ML models was slightly better than the MCDA models. The DST could further increase the accuracy of both ML models (AUC = 88.3) and MCDA models (AUC = 87.3). However,the best accuracy (AUC = 89.3) is reached through an ensemble of all four models.
机译:洪水是全球发生的最普遍的自然灾害之一。本研究的主要目的是使用两个多标准决策分析(MCDA)模型,包括分析层次过程(AHP)和分析网络过程(ANP)以及两个机器学习(ML)模型,包括随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM),为奥地利萨尔茨堡省制作洪水易发性图。此外,我们比较了哪些MCDA和ML模型更适合洪水易发性,并评估了使用Dempster谢弗理论(DST)根据11个洪水调节因素优化生成的洪水易感性图:高程、坡度、坡向、地形湿度指数(TWI)、河流功率指数(SPI)、归一化差值植被指数(NDVI)、地质、降雨量、 土地覆盖、与道路的距离和与排水的距离。通过AUC(受试者工作特征曲线下面积)方法和相对洪水密度(R-Index)对洪水易发性图的精度评估表明,RF(AUC =87.8%)和SVM(AUC =87%)优于ANP(AUC =86.6%)和AHP(AUC =85.9%)模型。因此,ML模型的预测性能略优于MCDA模型。DST 可以进一步提高 ML 模型 (AUC = 88.3%) 和 MCDA 模型 (AUC = 87.3%) 的准确性。然而,通过所有四个模型的集成,可以达到最佳精度(AUC = 89.3%)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号