...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental law >CATALYZING SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT
【24h】

CATALYZING SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT

机译:促进可持续投资

获取原文

摘要

Calls for increased focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues-and more particularly, on the kind of sustainable investing that will help achieve the U.N.'s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-run up against durable legal rules and norms of profit maximization. Corporate law, and especially Delaware law, remains committed to a shareholder wealth-maximizing orientation, and corporate directors typically can only consider other parties' interests to the extent that considering such interests can be justified as benefiting the shareholders. Trust law, which governs the behavior of many investment intermediaries, also generally requires a commitment to wealth maximization, as trustees generally may adopt ESG investing only if doing so will benefit the beneficiary by improving risk-adjusted returns. Thus, there is a tension between directors' and trustees' obligations under the law and the need to mobilize the trillions of dollars necessary to achieve the SDGs, at least to the extent that such investments sacrifice returns. Private capital will invest in sustainable projects, but only if the projects provide a market-rate risk-adjusted return. To direct capital to critical, sustainable projects, some have called for changes in legal doctrine and governance norms that would allow for greater flexibility in investment decision-making, such that fiduciaries could invest in ESG projects even if they do not provide an at-market return. This Article describes a different approach: the catalyzation of sustainable investment by governments to direct capital to sustainable projects - sovereign entities use unique advantages to directly invest in sustainable projects and broker sustainable investments by taking on deal risk and reducing transaction costs for other investors. Rather than attempting to reform or re-orient market forces, governments can (and do) use existing market strategies that are successfully applied in private contexts. In other words, rather than expecting investors to sacrifice returns to achieve the SDGs or other public ESG benefits, governments are catalyzing sustainable investment by harnessing a profit-maximizing orientation.
机译:呼吁更加关注环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题,尤其是有助于实现联合国可持续发展目标(SDG)的可持续投资,这与持久的法律规则和利润最大化的规范背道而驰。公司法,尤其是特拉华州法律,仍然致力于股东财富最大化的取向,公司董事通常只能考虑其他方的利益,只要考虑这些利益可以证明有利于股东。信托法规范许多投资中介机构的行为,通常也要求致力于财富最大化,因为受托人通常只有在通过提高风险调整后回报使受益人受益的情况下,才可以采用ESG投资。因此,董事和受托人在法律下的义务与动员实现可持续发展目标所需的数万亿美元的必要性之间存在紧张关系,至少在这种投资牺牲回报的程度上是这样。私人资本将投资于可持续项目,但前提是这些项目提供市场利率的风险调整后回报。为了将资金引导到关键的可持续项目,一些人呼吁改变法律原则和治理规范,以便在投资决策方面具有更大的灵活性,以便受托人可以投资于ESG项目,即使它们不能提供市场回报。本文介绍了一种不同的方法:催化政府可持续投资,将资金引导到可持续项目——主权实体利用独特的优势直接投资于可持续项目,并通过承担交易风险和降低其他投资者的交易成本来促成可持续投资。政府可以(并且确实)使用在私人环境中成功应用的现有市场战略,而不是试图改革或重新定位市场力量。换言之,政府不期望投资者牺牲回报来实现可持续发展目标或其他公共ESG利益,而是通过利用利润最大化的取向来促进可持续投资。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental law》 |2021年第4期|1221-1276|共56页
  • 作者

    PAUL ROSE;

  • 作者单位

    Ohio State University Moritz College of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号