...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Risk of anaphylaxis in cluster vs standard subcutaneous multiallergen immunotherapy
【24h】

Risk of anaphylaxis in cluster vs standard subcutaneous multiallergen immunotherapy

机译:丛集性过敏反应与标准皮下多变应原免疫治疗相比的全身性过敏反应风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

? 2022 American College of Allergy, Asthma ImmunologyBackground: Cluster schedules for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) require significantly fewer injections, but there have been conflicting reports regarding the risk of systemic reactions (SR). Objective: To compare the incidence of SRs during the build-up stages of multiallergen standard vs cluster immunotherapy. Methods: Data on SRs were collected prospectively from 91 urban adult patients who underwent either standard or cluster AIT at the Johns Hopkins Allergy and Asthma Center from 2014 to 2022. The SRs were recorded during the build-up phase and compared for both protocols using Pearson's χ2, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Overall, SR rates were 21 for patients in the standard schedule and 37 for patients in the cluster immunotherapy schedule, which was not statistically different (P = .08). However, the SR rate for each injection was 0.69 per injection in the standard protocol and 2.29 per injection in the cluster schedule (incident rate ratio = 3.3). All SRs (100) in both groups occurred in the second half of the build-up phase. Multivariate regression revealed that the target prescription protein nitrogen units and the number of allergens in the treatment vial did not influence SR rates (odds ratio = 1.00 and 1.06, respectively). Conclusion: The overall incidence of SR was not statistically different for cluster and standard AIT protocols. However, because cluster patients received approximately half the number of injections, the risk for SR per individual injection is more than 3-fold higher than that of standard immunotherapy.
机译:?2022 年美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学会背景:皮下过敏原免疫治疗 (AIT) 的集群时间表需要的注射次数明显减少,但关于全身反应 (SR) 风险的报道相互矛盾。目的:比较多变应原标准治疗与丛集免疫治疗积累阶段SRs的发生率。方法:前瞻性收集 2014 年至 2022 年在约翰霍普金斯大学过敏和哮喘中心接受标准或整群 AIT 的 91 例城市成人患者的 SR 数据。在建立阶段记录 SR,并使用 Pearson 的 χ2、Fisher 精确检验和多变量逻辑回归模型对两种方案进行比较。结果:总体而言,标准方案患者的SR率为21%,丛集免疫治疗方案患者的SR率为37%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.08)。然而,在标准方案中,每次进样的 SR 率为 0.69%,在整群计划中为每次进样 2.29%(发生率比 = 3.3)。两组的所有SR(100%)都发生在建立阶段的后半段。多因素回归结果显示,目标处方蛋白氮单位和治疗瓶中的过敏原数量对SR率没有影响(比值比分别=1.00和1.06)。结论:整群方案和标准AIT方案的SR总发生率差异无统计学意义。然而,由于聚集性患者接受的注射次数大约是其一半,因此每次注射的 SR 风险比标准免疫治疗高 3 倍以上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology》 |2023年第5期|622-627|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine;

    Asthma and Allergy Medical Group;

    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins UniversityDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 医学免疫学;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号