...
首页> 外文期刊>plos computational biology >Antithetic effect of interferon-alpha on cell-free and cell-to-cell HIV-1 infection
【24h】

Antithetic effect of interferon-alpha on cell-free and cell-to-cell HIV-1 infection

机译:干扰素-α 对游离和细胞间 HIV-1 感染的对抗作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Author summaryHIV-1 experiences a strong bottleneck during transmission, and only the virus(es) with higher resistance to the host's innate immunity, interferon (IFN), can be successfully transmitted. Because the IFN resistance tends to be disappeared during infection in infected individuals, this phenotype would be crucial for human-to-human transmission. By combining mathematical modeling with well-designed time-series viral infection experiments, we investigated the difference on the IFN resistance of two types of HIV-1, which were respectively isolated at the acute and chronic phases of infection, and classified it into two virus transmission modes, cell-free and cell-to-cell infections. We found that IFN suppresses HIV-1 cell-to-cell infection, but surprisingly, promotes cell-free infection. Moreover, the virus isolated during chronic infection is more sensitive to the IFN-mediated promoting effect than that isolated during acute infection. Our results suggest that HIV-1 selects different strategies to adapt to different host environments. We further provide an insight how viruses evolve to counteract or hijack the host immunity. In HIV-1-infected individuals, transmitted/founder (TF) virus contributes to establish new infection and expands during the acute phase of infection, while chronic control (CC) virus emerges during the chronic phase of infection. TF viruses are more resistant to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)-mediated antiviral effects than CC virus, however, its virological relevance in infected individuals remains unclear. Here we perform an experimental-mathematical investigation and reveal that IFN-alpha strongly inhibits cell-to-cell infection by CC virus but only weakly affects that by TF virus. Surprisingly, IFN-alpha enhances cell-free infection of HIV-1, particularly that of CC virus, in a virus-cell density-dependent manner. We further demonstrate that LY6E, an IFN-stimulated gene, can contribute to the density-dependent enhancement of cell-free HIV-1 infection. Altogether, our findings suggest that the major difference between TF and CC viruses can be explained by their resistance to IFN-alpha-mediated inhibition of cell-to-cell infection and their sensitivity to IFN-alpha-mediated enhancement of cell-free infection.
机译:作者摘要HIV-1在传播过程中会遇到很强的瓶颈,只有对宿主先天免疫具有较高抵抗力的病毒干扰素(IFN)才能成功传播。由于IFN耐药性在感染个体感染期间往往会消失,因此这种表型对于人际传播至关重要。通过将数学建模与精心设计的时间序列病毒感染实验相结合,我们研究了两种HIV-1在感染急性期和慢性期分离的IFN耐药性的差异,并将其分为两种病毒传播模式,即无细胞感染和细胞间感染。我们发现IFN抑制HIV-1细胞间感染,但令人惊讶的是,它促进了无细胞感染。此外,慢性感染期间分离的病毒比急性感染期间分离的病毒对IFN介导的促进作用更敏感。我们的结果表明,HIV-1选择不同的策略来适应不同的宿主环境。我们进一步提供了病毒如何进化以抵消或劫持宿主免疫力的见解。在HIV-1感染者中,传播/创始人(TF)病毒有助于建立新的感染并在感染的急性期扩大,而慢性对照(CC)病毒则在感染的慢性期出现。TF 病毒对干扰素-α (IFN-α) 介导的抗病毒作用比 CC 病毒更具抗性,但其在感染个体中的病毒学相关性尚不清楚。在这里,我们进行了实验数学研究,发现IFN-α强烈抑制CC病毒的细胞间感染,但仅弱于TF病毒。令人惊讶的是,IFN-α 以病毒细胞密度依赖性方式增强 HIV-1 的游离感染,尤其是 CC 病毒的游离感染。我们进一步证明,LY6E(一种IFN刺激的基因)可以促进无细胞HIV-1感染的密度依赖性增强。总而言之,我们的研究结果表明,TF和CC病毒之间的主要区别可以通过它们对IFN-α介导的细胞间感染抑制的抵抗力以及它们对IFN-α介导的无细胞感染增强的敏感性来解释。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号