首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Measuring Nursing Home Quality of Life: Validated Measures Are Poorly Correlated With Proxies From MDS and Quality of Life Deficiency Citationsl
【24h】

Measuring Nursing Home Quality of Life: Validated Measures Are Poorly Correlated With Proxies From MDS and Quality of Life Deficiency Citationsl

机译:衡量疗养院生活质量:经过验证的措施与 MDS 和生活质量缺陷引用的代理相关性差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

? 2023 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care MedicineObjectives: Ensuring quality of life (QoL) is an important goal of person-centered nursing home care. The provision of person-centered care relies on information captured in the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS). It is unclear to what extent MDS items or QoL-related facility deficiency citations correlate with validated measures of nursing home residents' QoL. This study evaluated correlation among MDS items, facility deficiency citations, and residents’ QoL from 2 states that currently collect these measures. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants: A total of 11,487 long-stay residents in 356 facilities in Minnesota and 13,835 long-stay residents in 851 facilities in Ohio in 2015. Methods: The outcome, QoL, was measured using validated instruments (Minnesota QoL survey and Ohio Resident Satisfaction Survey). Predictor variables included scores for Preference Assessment Tool (Section F), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Section D) for depressive symptoms from MDS, and count of QoL-related facility deficiency citations from the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting database. Spearman's ranked test assessed correlation between predictor and outcome variables. Mixed effects models evaluated associations of QoL summary scores with predictor variables, adjusting for resident- and facility-level characteristics, accounting for clustering at the facility level. Results: In Minnesota and Ohio, predictor variables (Section F and D items, and facility deficiency citations) correlated significantly but poorly with QoL (coefficients ranging from 0.003 to 0.3, P < .001). In the fully adjusted mixed effects model, all predictor variables, demographics, and functional status explained <21 of the total variance in QoL among residents. These findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses stratified by 1-year length of stay and by diagnosis of dementia. Conclusions and Implications: MDS items and facility deficiency citations encapsulate a significant but very small proportion of variance in residents’ QoL. This indicates the need to measure QoL directly among residents, to plan person-centered care, and to evaluate its performance in nursing home facilities.
机译:?2023 AMDA – 急性后和长期护理医学协会目标:确保生活质量 (QoL) 是以人为本的疗养院护理的重要目标。提供以人为本的护理依赖于最小数据集 3.0 (MDS) 中捕获的信息。目前尚不清楚 MDS 项目或与 QoL 相关的设施缺陷引用在多大程度上与疗养院居民 QoL 的有效测量相关。本研究评估了目前收集这些措施的 2 个州的 MDS 项目、设施缺陷引用和居民生活质量之间的相关性。设计:横断面研究。环境和参与者:2015 年,明尼苏达州 356 个设施中共有 11,487 名长期居民,俄亥俄州 851 个设施中共有 13,835 名长期居民。方法:使用经过验证的工具(明尼苏达州生活质量调查和俄亥俄州居民满意度调查)测量结果 QoL。预测变量包括偏好评估工具(F 部分)、MDS 抑郁症状患者健康问卷 9(D 部分)的分数,以及来自认证和调查提供者增强报告数据库的 QoL 相关设施缺陷引用计数。Spearman的排名检验评估了预测变量和结果变量之间的相关性。混合效应模型评估了 QoL 总分与预测变量的关联,调整了居民和设施级别的特征,并考虑了设施级别的聚类。结果:在明尼苏达州和俄亥俄州,预测变量(F 部分和 D 部分项目以及设施缺陷引用)与 QoL 显著相关,但相关性较差(系数范围为 0.003 至 0.3,P < 0.001)。在完全调整的混合效应模型中,所有预测变量、人口统计学和功能状态都解释了居民之间 QoL 总方差的 <21%。这些发现在按1年住院时间和痴呆诊断分层的敏感性分析中是一致的。结论和影响:MDS 项目和设施缺陷引用概括了居民 QoL 中显着但很小的差异比例。这表明需要直接测量居民的生活质量,规划以人为本的护理,并评估其在疗养院设施中的表现。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号