首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric urology >Response to commentary to 'Ultrasonographic evaluation of the children with candiduria for the fungal ball: Is it necessary?'
【24h】

Response to commentary to 'Ultrasonographic evaluation of the children with candiduria for the fungal ball: Is it necessary?'

机译:Response to commentary to "Ultrasonographic evaluation of the children with candiduria for the fungal ball: Is it necessary?"

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

First, we thank you for giving us the opportunity to clarify the points that mentioned in the letter. We also thank the author for expressing his concern and interest in our study [1]. In our study, 30 (19.4%) of the candiduria patients had candidemia, while only 18 (11.6%) of the candiduria patients had candidemia with the same candida species [2]. Despite the study population formed from the adults, Bougnoux et al. reported in a multicentre study reported that 8% of the candiduric patients developed candidemia with the same species [3]. On the contrary, another study from Greece, in which molecular analyses were also performed in the candida species isolated from urine and bloodstream, reported that only 2.8% of the isolates were genetically related [4].

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号