首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Evaluation of Pelvic Circular Compression Devices in Severely Injured Trauma Patients with Pelvic Fractures
【24h】

Evaluation of Pelvic Circular Compression Devices in Severely Injured Trauma Patients with Pelvic Fractures

机译:Evaluation of Pelvic Circular Compression Devices in Severely Injured Trauma Patients with Pelvic Fractures

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The role of pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) is to temporarily stabilize the pelvic ring, reduce its volume and to tamponade bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PCCDs on mortality and bleeding in severely injured trauma patients, using a large registry database. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients registered in the Trauma Register DGU (R) between 2015 and 2016. The study was limited to directly admitted patients who were alive on admission, with an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 or higher, with an Abbreviated Injury Scale AIS(pelvis) of 3-5, aged at least 16, and with complete status documentation on pelvic circular compression devices (PCCD) and mortality. A cohort analysis was undertaken of patients suffering from relevant pelvic fractures. Data were collected on mortality and requirements for blood transfusion. The observed outcome was compared with the expected outcome as derived from version II of the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC II) and adjusted accordingly. A Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) was also calculated. Results: A total of 9,910 patients were included. 1,103 of 9,910 patients suffered from a relevant pelvic trauma (AIS(pelvis) = 3-5). Only 41% (454 cases) of these received a PCCD. PCCD application had no significant effect on mortality and did not decrease the need for blood transfusion in the multivariate regression analysis. However, in this cohort, the application of a PCCD is a general indicator for a critical patient with increased mortality (12.0% no PCCD applied vs. 23.2% PCCD applied prehospital vs. 27.1% PCCD applied in the emergency department). The ISS was higher in patients with PCCD (34.12 +/- 16.4 vs. 27.9 +/- 13.8; p < 0.001). Conclusion: PCCD was applied more often in patients with severe pelvic trauma according to ISS and AIS(pelvis) as well with deterioration in circulatory status. PCCDs did not reduce mortality or reduce the need for blood transfusion.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号