首页> 外文期刊>Cancer cytopathology. >A Positive HPV Test With Positive p16/Ki-67 Double Staining in Self-Sampled Vaginal Material Is an Accurate Tool to Detect Women at Risk for Cervical Cancer
【24h】

A Positive HPV Test With Positive p16/Ki-67 Double Staining in Self-Sampled Vaginal Material Is an Accurate Tool to Detect Women at Risk for Cervical Cancer

机译:HPV 检测呈阳性,对自我取样的阴道材料进行 p16/ki-67 双重染色阳性,是检测有宫颈癌风险的女性的准确工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The development of efficient strategies for managing high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-positive women is a major challenge when human papillomavirus-based primary screening is being performed. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of HR-HPV testing based on self-collection (SC) and HR-HPV testing based on collection by a health professional (HP) and to assess the potential usefulness of HR-HPV testing combined with testing with the biomarkers p16/Ki-67, α-mannosidase, and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 232 women admitted for colposcopy because of an abnormal Papanicolaou smear. The collected material underwent liquid-based cytology, HR-HPV detection, and immunocytochemical testing (p16/Ki-67, α-mannosidase, and SOD2). The gold standard was the histopathological resu the positive reference was CIN2+. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of HR-HPV testing was 76.6; the results for the SC group (78.1) and the HP group (75.2) were similar. The positive predictive values (HP, 76.5; SC, 80.0), the negative predictive values (HP, 66.7; SC, 64.3), the positive likelihood values (HP, 1.35; SC, 1.36), and the negative likelihood values (HP, 0.21; SC, 0.19) were also similar. p16/Ki-67 showed higher sensitivity than the other 2 biomarkers: 78.1 versus 45.8 for α-mannosidase and 44.5 for SOD2. The specificities of the biomarkers were equivalent: 71.4 for p16/Ki-67, 77.8 for α-mannosidase, and 71.2 for SOD2. In the HP group, accuracy also leaned more heavily toward the final score (using α-mannosidase and SOD2) without statistical significance (80.8 vs 77.9). The contrast with the SC group yielded the same level of accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: SC, when associated with testing with biomarkers, is as accurate as collection by HPs in the detection of women at risk for cervical cancer.
机译:背景:在进行基于人瘤病毒的初步筛查时,制定管理高危人瘤病毒 (HR-HPV) 阳性女性的有效策略是一项重大挑战。本研究的目的是评估基于自我收集 (SC) 的 HR-HPV 检测和基于卫生专业人员 (HP) 收集的 HR-HPV 检测的比较有效性,并评估 HR-HPV 检测结合生物标志物 p16/Ki-67、α-甘露糖苷酶和超氧化物歧化酶 2 (SOD2) 检测的潜在有用性。方法: 这是一项横断面研究,涉及 232 名因巴氏涂片异常而入院接受阴道镜检查的女性。收集的材料进行了液基细胞学、HR-HPV 检测和免疫细胞化学检测(p16/Ki-67、α-甘露糖苷酶和 SOD2)。金标准是组织病理学结果;阳性参考是CIN2+。结果:HR-HPV检测总体准确率为76.6%;SC组(78.1%)和HP组(75.2%)的结果相似。阳性预测值(HP,76.5%;SC,80.0%),阴性预测值(HP,66.7%;SC,64.3%),正似然值(HP,1.35;SC,1.36)和负似然值(HP,0.21;SC,0.19)也类似。p16/Ki-67 的敏感性高于其他 2 种生物标志物:78.1% 对 α-甘露糖苷酶为 45.8%,对 SOD2 为 44.5%。生物标志物的特异性相当:p16/Ki-67 为 71.4%,77。α-甘露糖苷酶为 8%,SOD2 为 71.2%。在HP组中,准确性也更倾向于最终分数(使用α-甘露糖苷酶和SOD2),没有统计学意义(80.8%对77.9%)。与SC组的对比产生了相同的准确性水平。结论:当SC与生物标志物检测相关时,在检测有宫颈癌风险的女性方面与HP收集的检测一样准确。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号