首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Moxifloxacin monotherapy for treatment of uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Moxifloxacin monotherapy for treatment of uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:莫西沙星单药治疗单纯性盆腔炎性疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及随机对照试验的试验序贯分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin monotherapy for the treatment of uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease (uPID). Methods The literatures from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Cochrane library and the http://clinicaltrials.gov/ were retrieved until February 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with other antibiotics for treating uPID were included. The primary outcomes were clinical cure rate (CCR), bacteriological success rates (BSR) and risk of drug‐related adverse events (AEs). We used random‐effects modelled meta‐analysis, trial sequential analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42023428751). Results A total of four RCTs that enrolled 3201 women patients with uPID were included. In the per‐protocol populations, no significant difference was observed between patients given moxifloxacin and those given other antibiotics with regard to CCR at test‐of‐cure (TOC) (2485 patients, odds ratio OR?=?0.84, 95 confidence interval CI 0.68–1.04, p?=?0.12). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference between patients given moxifloxacin and those given other antibiotics in terms of BSR at TOC (471 patients, OR?=?1.17, 95 CI 0.70–1.96, p?=?0.56) in the microbiologically valid population. However, drug‐related AEs occurred less frequently with moxifloxacin than with other antibiotics (2973 patients, OR?=?0.74, 95 CI 0.64–0.86, p?
机译:摘要 目的 评价莫西沙星单药治疗单药治疗单纯性盆腔炎(uPID)的疗效和安全性。方法 检索PubMed、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar、Cochrane图书馆和 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ 文献,检索时间截止到2023年2月。仅纳入比较莫西沙星与其他抗生素治疗uPID的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials, RCTs)。主要结局是临床治愈率(CCR)、细菌学成功率(BSR)和药物相关不良事件(AEs)的风险。我们使用了随机效应模型meta分析、试验序贯分析以及推荐分级评估、制定和评价。该研究已在国际前瞻性系统综述注册库(International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews)中注册(注册号:CRD42023428751)。结果 共纳入4项随机对照试验,共纳入3201例女性uPID患者。在符合方案的人群中,在治愈测试(TOC)时,给予莫西沙星的患者与给予其他抗生素的患者在CCR方面没有观察到显著差异(2485名患者,比值比[OR]?=?0.84,95%置信区间[CI] 0.68-1.04,p?=?0.12)。同样,接受莫西沙星治疗的患者与接受其他抗生素治疗的患者在TOC时的BSR差异无统计学意义(471例患者,OR?=?1.17,95%CI 0.70–1.96,p?=?0。56)在微生物学有效的人群中。然而,与其他抗生素相比,莫西沙星组药物相关不良事件的发生率较低(2973 例患者,OR?=?0.74,95% CI 0.64–0.86,p?0.0001),尤其是胃肠道不良事件(2973 例患者,OR?=?0.59,95% CI 0.47–0.74,p?0.00001)。结论 在uPID的治疗中,莫西沙星单药治疗的疗效与其他联合治疗方案相似。此外,莫西沙星比对照组具有更好的安全性。基于其额外的优势(即更好的安全性、无需调整剂量和更好的依从性),与目前使用的方案相比,莫西沙星可能是一个更有吸引力的选择。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号