Objectives: We identified and quantified the gap between emergency medicine (EM) procedures currently taught using simulation versus those that educators would teach if they had better procedural task trainers. Additionally, we endeavored to describe which procedures were taught using homemade models and the barriers to creation and use of additional homemade models. Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, we developed a survey and distributed it to a convenience sample of EM simulationists via the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Simulation Academy listserv. Survey items asked participants to identify procedures they thought should be taught using simulation ("most important"), do teach using simulation ("most frequent"), would teach if a simulator or model were available ("most needed"), and do teach using simulation with "homemade" models ("most frequent homemade").
展开▼
机译：目标：我们确定并量化了目前使用模拟教授的急诊医学 （EM） 程序与教育工作者在拥有更好的程序任务培训师时将教授的程序之间的差距。此外，我们努力描述使用自制模型教授哪些程序，以及创建和使用其他自制模型的障碍。方法：使用改进的德尔菲法，我们开发了一项调查，并通过学术急诊医学模拟学院列表服务协会将其分发给 EM 模拟师的便利样本。调查项目要求参与者确定他们认为应该使用模拟教授的程序（“最重要”），使用模拟进行教学（“最频繁”），如果模拟器或模型可用（“最需要”），以及使用“自制”模型进行模拟教学（“最频繁的自制”）。
展开▼
