A simulation study of three sequential methods for the comparison of two treatment groups when the response criterion is censored

摘要

AbstractThree recent sequential methods, group sequential analysis (GSA), the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) and the triangular test (TT) are well suited to randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion, as they do not require matched pairs of patients.We undertook a simulation study to investigate their statistical properties and to compare these three methods with the fixed‐sample design. Our results suggest that (i) the three methods have the expected statistical properties for size and power; (ii) they allow an important reduction of the average number of events before stopping, except with GSA when there is no treatment difference; (iii) the triangular test (closed design) appears the optimal design, as the variance of the number of events is smaller than with the sequential probability ratio test (open design) and (iv) analysis after every twenty new events does not alter the statistical properties of these sequential methods and enhances their usefulnes