...
首页> 外文期刊>HIV Research & Clinical Practice >96-week results of a dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus rilpivirine once a day vs triple therapy in patients with suppressed viraemia: virological success and non-HIV related morbidity evaluation
【24h】

96-week results of a dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus rilpivirine once a day vs triple therapy in patients with suppressed viraemia: virological success and non-HIV related morbidity evaluation

机译:达芦那韦/利托那韦加利匹韦林每天一次与抑制病毒血症患者三联治疗的 96 周结果:病毒学成功和非 HIV 相关发病率评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Antiretroviral therapies have been tested with the goal of maintaining virological suppression with a particular attention in limiting drug-related toxicity. With this aim we designed the DUAL study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, 96 weeks-long pilot exploratory study in virologically suppressed HIV-1+ patients with the aim of evaluating the immunovirological success and the impact on non-HIV related morbidity of switching to a dual therapy with darunavir-ritonavir (DRV/r) and rilpivirine (RPV). We recruited patients who received a PI/r-containing HAART for >= 6 months, HIV-RNA = 3 months, eGFR > 60 mL/min/1,73m2, without DRV or RPV RAMs. We randomized patients in arm A: RPV + DRV/r QD or arm B: ongoing triple therapy. The primary endpoint has been defined as the percentage of patients with HIV-RNA < 50 cp/mL at week 48 (ITT). VACS index, Framingham CVD risk (FRS) and urinary RBP (uRBP) were calculated. We used Chi-square or Fisher statistics for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U for continuous ones. Forty-one patients were enrolled (22 in arm A, 14 in arm B, plus 5 screening failures): 30 patients reached 96 weeks: 100 had HIV-RNA < 50 cp/mL in arm A versus 91.7 in arm B. Similar changes were observed in median CD4/mL between baseline and week 96 (+59 versus - 31, p: n.s.). Thirty-one in arm A and 23 in arm B adverse events took place, whereas only 1 was serious (arm A: turbinate hypertrophy, unrelated to HAART). Among the 6 discontinuations (3 in A, 3 in B), only 1 was related to adverse event (arm A: G3 depression, insomnia, weakness). VACS index, median FRS and median uRBP values did not vary from baseline to week 96. At 96-weeks all patients switched to a QD 2-drug regimen based on DRV/r + RPV maintained HIV-RNA suppression, but a single patient who showed a virological failure at week 4. CD4 counts increased overtime without significant differences between the two arms. The novel dual regimen was well tolerated with the same amount of discontinuation as the control arm. VACS index, FRS and uRBP did not differ between arms at week 96.
机译:抗逆转录病毒疗法已经过测试,其目的是维持病毒学抑制,并特别注意限制药物相关毒性。为此,我们设计了 DUAL 研究:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、为期 96 周的试点探索性研究,针对病毒学抑制的 HIV-1+ 患者,旨在评估免疫病毒学的成功率以及改用达芦那韦-利托那韦 (DRV/r) 和利匹韦林 (RPV) 双重疗法对非 HIV 相关发病率的影响。我们招募了接受含PI/r的HAART治疗>=6个月,HIV-RNA=3个月,eGFR>60mL/min/1.73m2,无DRV或RPV RAM的患者。我们将患者随机分为A组:RPV + DRV/r QD或B组:正在进行的三联疗法。主要终点定义为第 48 周 HIV-RNA < 50 cp/mL 的患者百分比 (ITT)。计算VACS指数、Framingham CVD风险(FRS)和尿RBP(uRBP)。我们对分类变量使用卡方统计量或Fisher统计量,对连续变量使用Mann-Whitney U统计量。入组了 41 例患者(A 组 22 例,B 组 14 例,外加 5 例筛查失败):30 例患者达到 96 周:A 组 100% 的 HIV-RNA < 50 cp/mL,B 组为 91.7%。 基线和第 96 周之间中位 CD4/mL 也观察到类似的变化(+59 vs - 31,p:n.s.)。A组有31例不良事件发生,B组有23例发生不良事件,而只有1例是严重的(A组:鼻甲肥大,与HAART无关)。在 6 例停药中(A 组 3 例,B 组 3 例),只有 1 例与不良事件相关(A 组:G3 抑郁、失眠、虚弱)。VACS指数、中位FRS和中位uRBP值从基线到第96周没有变化。在 96 周时,所有患者都改用基于 DRV/r + RPV 的 QD 2 药物方案维持了 HIV-RNA 抑制,但只有一名患者在第 4 周时表现出病毒学失败。CD4 计数随时间推移而增加,两组之间没有显着差异。新型双重方案耐受性良好,停药量与对照组相同。在第96周时,VACS指数、FRS和uRBP在两组之间没有差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号