Validation of Central Pressure Estimation in Patients with an Aortic Aneurysm Before and After Endovascular Repair

摘要

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate if non-invasive central pressure estimations are accurate in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, before and after endovascular repair. Secondary evaluation was if measurement-accuracy was dependent on anatomical characteristics. Methods Procedural invasive and non-invasive pressure-measurements were performed simultaneously both before and after endovascular repair in 20 patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Invasive catheter measurements were performed in the abdominal aorta. A tonometric device was used to perform non-invasive pressure-wave-analysis at the radial artery. A generalized transfer-function was used to generate an ascending aortic waveform for both measurements, allowing for direct comparison. Results Pre-treatment the mean differences between methods were - 5.5 mmHg (p = .904), - 11.8 (p < .001), and - 7.2 mmHg (p = .124) for central systolic, diastolic, and mean pressure, respectively. The accuracy was dependent of aneurysm sac volume and intraluminal thrombus volume. Post-treatment limits of agreement were smaller for all pressure parameters compared to pre-treatment. The mean differences were 6.5 mmHg (p = .007), - 6.4 (p < .020), and 1.6 mmHg (p = .370) for central systolic, diastolic, and mean pressure, respectively. Conclusion In untreated AAA's the accuracy of non-invasive central pressure estimation was acceptable (mean difference between 5 and 10 mmHg) when compared to invasive pressures, but dependent of AAA characteristics. After EVAR the accuracy of central pressure estimation improved (reduction of 75 of the mean difference between pre and post measurements)