...
首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously?
【24h】

Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously?

机译:当内生地控制注意力时,空间选择和身份提取是否可分离?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Visual search for a target involves two processes: spatial selection and identity extraction. Ghorashi, Enns, and Di Lollo (2008) found these processes to be independent and surmised that they were carried out along distinct visual pathways: dorsal and ventral, respectively. The two experiments that are described in the present article evaluated this hypothesis. Attentional-blink methodology was combined with voluntary spatial cuing in a visual search task: Intertarget lag was used to manipulate identity extraction; predictive cues were used to signal target locations. Central digit cues in Experiment 1 required participants to identify digits before voluntarily directing attention to a corresponding location, whereas flashed dots in Experiment 2 (indicating an opposite location) required attentional redeployment without prior cue identification. Consistent with the dual-pathway hypothesis, cuing was impaired only when the first target and the number cue competed for ventral-pathway mechanisms. Collectively, the results support the dual-pathway account of the separability of spatial selection and identity extraction.
机译:视觉搜索目标涉及两个过程:空间选择和身份提取。 Ghorashi,Enns和Di Lollo(2008)发现这些过程是独立的,并推测它们是沿着不同的视觉途径分别进行的:背侧和腹侧。本文中描述的两个实验评估了该假设。在视觉搜索任务中,注意眨眼方法与自愿空间提示相结合:目标间滞后用于操纵身份提取;预测性提示被用来发出目标位置的信号。实验1中的中心数字提示要求参与者在主动将注意力转移到相应位置之前先识别数字,而实验2中的闪烁点(指示相反的位置)则需要注意重新部署,而无需事先进行提示识别。与双重途径假说一致,仅当第一个靶标和数目线索竞争了腹侧途径机制时,暗示才受到损害。总的来说,这些结果支持了空间选择和身份提取可分离性的双重途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号