首页> 外文期刊>Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries >Spatial management of estuarine fisheries resources: Do recreational-only fished estuaries provide conservation to harvested species?
【24h】

Spatial management of estuarine fisheries resources: Do recreational-only fished estuaries provide conservation to harvested species?

机译:河口渔业资源的空间管理:仅供娱乐捕捞的河口是否为捕捞物种提供保护?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Management of fisheries by preventing commercial, whilst allowing recreational-only fishing in some areas, is intended to increase stocks so that sustainable recreational fishing is conserved or enhanced. This study examined whether the relative abundances and length and age characteristics of five harvested species of fish differed between recreational-only fished (ROF) estuaries, and those open to both recreational and commercial fishing (non-ROF) in southeastern Australia. Specific predictions based on absolute and ranked values of a range of parameters were made so that conclusions could be reached about the effects of management. Fish were sampled using multimesh gillnets in a standard and stratified manner across two ROF and two non-ROF estuaries over three years, six to eight years post ROF implementation. Abundances of each species fluctuated among individual estuaries and sampling times with no indication of greater abundances in ROF estuaries. For four species (Sillago ciliata, Mugil cephalus, Acanthopagrus spp. and Girella tricuspidata), the mean lengths and the proportions of individuals of legal length, were mostly greater in the ROF compared to the non-ROF estuaries. However, for Platycephalus fuscus there were no discernible patterns. Three species (P. fuscus, S. ciliata and Acanthopagrus spp.) had a significantly greater proportion of older fish in the ROF estuaries, but for M. cephalus and G. tricuspidata this was only evident in one ROF estuary. It is hypothesised that the cessation of commercial fishing and subsequent reduction in fishing pressure in the ROF estuaries allowed a greater proportion of individuals of each species to survive to become larger and older. This study provides correlative evidence that ROF estuaries can protect some harvested species at the local scale of estuary. Examination of lengths and ages of fish, rather than simply their abundances, was necessary to identify the effects of removing commercial fishing. Further research is required to determine the potential broader-scale and long-term sustainability benefits on species as well as any spill-over effects on other organisms and estuarine ecosystems.
机译:通过防止商业捕鱼来管理渔业,同时允许在某些地区进行休闲捕鱼,旨在增加种群,以便保护或加强可持续的休闲捕鱼。本研究考察了澳大利亚东南部仅休闲捕捞 (ROF) 河口与对休闲和商业捕鱼开放 (non-ROF) 的河口之间五种捕捞鱼类的相对丰度、长度和年龄特征是否存在差异。根据一系列参数的绝对值和排名值进行具体预测,以便得出有关管理效果的结论。在三年内,即ROF实施后六至八年,使用多网刺网以标准和分层方式在两个ROF和两个非ROF河口对鱼类进行采样。每个物种的丰度在各个河口和采样时间之间波动,没有迹象表明ROF河口的丰度更高。对于4个物种(Sillago ciliata、Mugil cephalus、Acanthopagrus spp.和Girella tricuspidata),与非ROF河口相比,ROF的平均长度和法定长度个体的比例大多更大。然而,对于Platycephalus fuscus,没有明显的模式。3个物种(P. fuscus、S. ciliata和Acanthopagrus spp.)在ROF河口的老年鱼比例显著增加,但对于M. cephalus和G. tricuspidata来说,这仅在一个ROF河口明显。据推测,商业捕鱼的停止和随后在ROF河口的捕鱼压力的降低使每个物种的更大比例的个体得以存活,从而变得更大更老。本研究提供了相关证据,证明ROF河口可以在河口的局部尺度上保护一些收获物种。有必要检查鱼类的长度和年龄,而不仅仅是它们的丰度,以确定取消商业捕捞的影响。需要进一步的研究来确定对物种的潜在更广泛和长期的可持续性效益,以及对其他生物和河口生态系统的任何溢出效应。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号