首页> 外文期刊>Geriatrics & gerontology international. >Prognosis of home-cared or hospital-treated acute fever in older adults: A prospective multicenter case-control study
【24h】

Prognosis of home-cared or hospital-treated acute fever in older adults: A prospective multicenter case-control study

机译:老年人居家护理或医院治疗急性发热的预后:一项前瞻性多中心病例对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the prognosis of older patients who received home care or hospitalized care to treat acute fever in Japan.Methods: This prospective case-control study screened 192 registered acutely pyrexic older patients who received home care at 10 medical institutions in Japan, and enrolled 15 and 30 patients who were treated in the hospital (hospitalized group) and at home (home-care group), respectively, matched for fever and the physical conditions before fever onset. Intergroup differences in the 90-day mortality from fever onset and changes in patients' disability and dementia from the pre-fever to 90 days post-fever onset were determined.Results: No significant intergroup difference in the 90-day mortality rate was detected (26.7 vs 13.3 for hospitalized and home-care groups, respectively, P = 0.41). Disability tended to worsen in the hospitalized group compared with the home-care group (54.5 vs 23.1, respectively, P = 0.06), whereas dementia significantly worsened in the hospitalized group compared with the home-care group (45.5 vs 3.8, respectively, P = 0.02).Conclusions: Home care confers a better prognosis for treating acute fever in older people whose daily functions have deteriorated enough to necessitate regular home care. This study assists those people in making informed choices about where to receive treatment for acute fever. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; center dot center dot: center dot center dot-center dot center dot.
机译:目的:本研究旨在调查日本接受家庭护理或住院治疗急性发热的老年患者预后的差异方法:本前瞻性病例对照研究筛选了 192 例在日本 10 家医疗机构接受家庭护理的注册急性发热老年患者,并入组了 15 例和 30 例在医院(住院组)和在家(家庭护理组)接受治疗的患者, 分别与发烧和发烧前的身体状况相匹配。测定发热后90天死亡率与发热前至发热后90天残疾和痴呆变化的组间差异。结果:90天死亡率未发现显著组间差异(住院组和家庭护理组分别为26.7%和13.3%,P=0.41)。与家庭护理组相比,住院组的残疾趋于恶化(分别为54.5%和23.1%,P = 0.06),而与家庭护理组相比,住院组的痴呆显著恶化(分别为45.5%和3.8%,P = 0.02)。结论:对于日常功能恶化到需要定期家庭护理的老年人,家庭护理对治疗急性发热具有更好的预后。这项研究帮助这些人就在哪里接受急性发热治疗做出明智的选择。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023;中心点中心点:中心点中心点-中心点中心点。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号