首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial

机译:股神经与内收肌管阻滞在腘绳肌自体移植物前交叉韧带重建后早期术后疼痛控制和膝关节功能:一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction The optimal pain management strategy for postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear. This study compared femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) for pain management of early postoperative pain, knee function, and recovery of activity of daily living (ADL) after ACLR using hamstring autografts. Material and methods In this prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, 64 patients aged 12-56 years who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft between August 2019 and May 2020 were randomised to undergo preoperative FNB (n = 32) or ACB (n = 32). The peripheral nerve block was performed by a single experienced anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain as evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively and the need for pain relief. The secondary outcome was knee function, including the recovery of range of motion, contraction of the vastus medialis, and stable walking with a double-crutch (ADL), as evaluated by blinded physical therapists. Results There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. The VAS scores, need for pain relief, knee function, and ADL did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion FNB and ACB provided comparable outcomes related to early postoperative pain, knee function, and ADL after double-bundle ACLR using hamstring autografts. Further research is necessary to evaluate the mid- to long-term effect of each block on recovery of knee function and ADL.
机译:引言 前交叉韧带重建 (ACLR) 术后疼痛的最佳疼痛管理策略尚不清楚。本研究比较了股神经阻滞 (FNB) 和内收肌管阻滞 (ACB) 在使用腘绳肌自体移植物治疗 ACLR 后早期疼痛、膝关节功能和日常生活活动恢复 (ADL) 方面的疼痛管理。材料和方法 在这项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验中,64 名年龄在 12-56 岁之间在 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受解剖学双束 ACLR 和腘绳肌自体移植的患者被随机分配接受术前 FNB (n = 32) 或 ACB (n = 32)。周围神经阻滞由一位经验丰富的麻醉师在超声引导下进行。主要结局是术后3、6、12、24和48小时使用视觉模拟量表(visual anamic scale, VAS)评估的术后疼痛以及缓解疼痛的需要。次要结局是膝关节功能,包括关节活动度的恢复、股内侧肌的收缩和用双拐杖(ADL)稳定行走,由盲法物理治疗师评估。结果 两组患者人口统计学差异无统计学意义。两组之间的VAS评分、疼痛缓解需求、膝关节功能和ADL差异无统计学意义。结论 FNB和ACB在腘绳肌自体移植物双束ACLR术后早期疼痛、膝关节功能和ADL方面具有可比性。需要进一步的研究来评估每个阻滞对膝关节功能和 ADL 恢复的中长期影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号