首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Preloaded injectors used in a clinical study: videographic assessment and laboratory analysis of injector nozzle damage
【24h】

Preloaded injectors used in a clinical study: videographic assessment and laboratory analysis of injector nozzle damage

机译:临床研究中使用的预加载喷油器:喷油器喷嘴损坏的视频评估和实验室分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate quality and duration of implantation of 2 preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) injectors and assess postimplantation damage. Setting: The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative study with laboratory investigation. Methods: Implantation videos and postuse injectors from 60 paired eyes of 30 bilateral cataract patients were included. Patient eyes were randomly assigned for implantation with 2 different preloaded injectors: the AutonoMe with a Clareon IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and the iSert with a Vivinex IOL (Hoya Corp.). Videos were reviewed for events during the implantation procedure, and the duration of each step of implantation. Injector nozzles were examined under light and scanning electron microscopy. Damage was graded and correlated with the IOL power. Three months postoperatively IOLs were assessed for material changes. Results: IOL delivery was without any critical events in 60 of the 60 eyes. The implantation took 56 seconds with the AutonoMe and 44 seconds with the iSert (P < .05). Most AutonoMe injectors (29; 97) showed no damage or slight deformation. In most of the iSert injectors (25; 80), short or extended cracks were present, and damage lengths correlated with the IOL power. All IOLs were free of material changes, including glistenings, 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Both preloaded IOL injectors allowed a safe and convenient IOL delivery. Implantation of the Clareon IOL took, on average, slightly longer than that of the Vivinex IOL, mostly due to a slower IOL unfolding. The AutonoMe showed less nozzle tip damage than that of the iSert. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47:1338-1344 Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS Online Video
机译:目的:评估 2 个预加载人工晶状体 (IOL) 注射器的植入质量和持续时间,并评估植入后损伤。地点:德国海德堡海德堡大学眼科系 David J. Apple 视觉研究中心。设计:前瞻性、随机、比较研究与实验室调查。方法:纳入30例双侧白内障患者的60双眼的植入视频和使用后注射器。患者的眼睛被随机分配植入 2 种不同的预加载注射器:带有 Clareon IOL 的 AutonoMe (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) 和带有 Vivinex IOL 的 iSert (Hoya Corp.)。对植入过程中的事件以及植入每个步骤的持续时间的视频进行了审查。在光学和扫描电子显微镜下检查喷油器喷嘴。损伤分级并与人工晶状体功率相关。术后三个月评估人工晶状体的材料变化。结果:60 只眼睛中有 60 只未发生任何严重事件。AutonoMe的植入时间为56秒,iSert的植入时间为44秒(P < .05)。大多数AutonoMe喷油器(29,97%)没有损坏或轻微变形。在大多数 iSert 注射器(25,80%)中,存在短裂纹或延长裂纹,损伤长度与 IOL 功率相关。术后 3 个月,所有人工晶状体均无物质变化,包括闪光。结论:两种预加载的人工晶状体注射器都允许安全方便的人工晶状体输送。平均而言,Clareon 人工晶状体的植入时间比 Vivinex 人工晶状体的植入时间略长,主要是由于人工晶状体展开较慢。AutonoMe 的喷嘴尖端损坏比 iSert 少。J 白内障屈光外科杂志 2021;47:1338-1344 版权所有 (c) 2021 作者。由 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 代表 ASCRS 和 ESCRS 在线视频发布

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号