Abstract.It has long been hypothesized that fibronectin (Fn) is essential to the function of the reticuloendothelial system (RES) and that the reversal of Fn deficiency in critically ill patients would result in a clinical benefit to these patients. Fn administration to deficient patients was postulated to improve the function of the RES, decrease the incidence of organ failure, sepsis and ultimately mortality. Over the past 15 years, several clinical studies have been performed to test these hypotheses. The initial anecdotal studies using cryoprecipitate (a plasma fraction enriched in Fn) revealed promising results but were neither controlled nor blinded. Further controlled studies were published utilizing both cryoprecipitate and purified Fn. Unfortunately, the great majority of authors found no beneficial effects of Fn administration in critically ill patients, in relation to incidence of organ failure, sepsis, or mortality. These results do not support the use of Fn in this setting.Fn utilization in wound healing has shown promising results in case reports. Although its role in wound healing is not yet fully delineated, initial reports with corneal wounds show a beneficial influence of Fn administration. Further studies are needed to determine the exact function(s) of Fn in a healing wound. Efficacy must still be shown in controlled clinical trials; dosing and administration regimens need to be elucidated.
展开▼
