...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >The controversy around technical standards for similar biotherapeutics: barriers to access and competition?
【24h】

The controversy around technical standards for similar biotherapeutics: barriers to access and competition?

机译:The controversy around technical standards for similar biotherapeutics: barriers to access and competition?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Technical standards for medicines' marketing authorization are technical issues. Nonetheless, policy, political and commercial matters also play a role. Given that technical standards impact competitor's market entry pace and prices, regulators are compelled to strike a balance between access, safety, and quality,1 determine which standards are necessary to protect human health and tear down unnecessary barriers to competition. There is a consensus that generic medicines can be approved via "abbreviated pathways". However, for biotherapeutics, there is an ongoing global controversy as to whether the abbreviated approach is also applicable. It evolves as emerging evidence about safety and efficacy of biosimilars gets published. We identified three types of regulatory barriers to competition. Here we propose a conceptual approach to analyze them. The triangle illustrates the rationale behind the debates around the regulatory requirements for biosimilars and the impact of those requirements on access (Figure 1).

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号