...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting
【24h】

High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting

机译:High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Real‐world evidence used for regulatory, payer, and clinical decision‐making requires principled epidemiology in design and analysis, applying methods to minimize confounding given the lack of randomization. One technique to deal with potential confounding is propensity score (PS) analysis, which allows for the adjustment for measured preexposure covariates. Since its first publication in 2009, the high‐dimensional propensity score (hdPS) method has emerged as an approach that extends traditional PS covariate selection to include large numbers of covariates that may reduce confounding bias in the analysis of healthcare databases. hdPS is an automated, data‐driven analytic approach for covariate selection that empirically identifies preexposure variables and proxies to include in the PS model. This article provides an overview of the hdPS approach and recommendations on the planning, implementation, and reporting of hdPS used for causal treatment‐effect estimations in longitudinal healthcare databases. We supply a checklist with key considerations as a supportive decision tool to aid investigators in the implementation and transparent reporting of hdPS techniques, and to aid decision‐makers unfamiliar with hdPS in the understanding and interpretation of studies employing this approach. This article is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号