...
首页> 外文期刊>Health promotion international >Ethics, effectiveness and population health information interventions: a Canadian analysis
【24h】

Ethics, effectiveness and population health information interventions: a Canadian analysis

机译:伦理、有效性和人口健康信息干预:加拿大分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Population health information interventions (PHIIs) use information in efforts to promote health. PHIIs may push information to a target audience (communication), pull information from the public (surveillance), or combine both in a bidirectional intervention. Although PHIIs have often been framed as non-invasive and ethically innocuous, in reality they may be intrusive into people's lives, affecting not only their health but their senses of security, respect, and self-determination. Ethical acceptability of PHIIs may have impacts on intervention effectiveness, potentially giving rise to unintended consequences. This article examines push, pull, and bidirectional PHIIs using empirical data from an ethnographic study of young mothers in Greater Vancouver, Canada. Data were collected from October 2013 to December 2014 via naturalistic observation and individual interviews with 37 young mothers ages 16-22. Transcribed interviews and field notes were analyzed using inductive qualitative thematic analysis. Both push and pull interventions were experienced as non-neutral by the target population, and implementation factors on a structural and individual scale affected intervention ethics and effectiveness. Based on our findings, we suggest that careful ethical consideration be applied to use of PHIIs as health promotion tools. Advancing the ethics of PHIIs' will benefit from empirical data that is informed by information and computer science theory and methods. Information technologies, digital health promotion services, and integrated surveillance programs reflect important areas for investigation in terms of their effects and ethics. Health promotion researchers, practitioners, and ethicists should explore these across contexts and populations.
机译:人口健康信息干预 (PHII) 使用信息来促进健康。PHII 可以将信息推送给目标受众(通信)、从公众那里获取信息(监控),或者将两者结合起来进行双向干预。尽管 PHI 通常被认为是非侵入性的,在道德上是无害的,但实际上它们可能会侵入人们的生活,不仅影响他们的健康,还影响他们的安全感、尊重感和自决感。PHII的伦理可接受性可能会对干预效果产生影响,从而可能产生意想不到的后果。本文使用来自加拿大大温哥华地区年轻母亲的民族志研究的经验数据来研究推、拉和双向 PHII。2013 年 10 月至 2014 年 12 月,通过自然观察和对 37 名 16-22 岁年轻母亲的个体访谈收集数据。使用归纳定性主题分析分析转录的访谈和现场笔记。目标人群认为推式和拉式干预都是非中性的,结构和个人规模的实施因素影响了干预的伦理和有效性。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议在使用 PHII 作为健康促进工具时应仔细考虑伦理问题。推进 PHI 的伦理将受益于由信息和计算机科学理论和方法提供信息的经验数据。信息技术、数字健康促进服务和综合监测计划反映了其影响和伦理方面的重要调查领域。健康促进研究人员、从业者和伦理学家应该在不同的环境和人群中探索这些。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号