首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Would a Large tPA Trial for Those 4.5 to 6.0 Hours from Stroke Onset Be Good Value for Information?
【24h】

Would a Large tPA Trial for Those 4.5 to 6.0 Hours from Stroke Onset Be Good Value for Information?

机译:对卒中发作后 4.5 至 6.0 小时进行大型 tPA 试验是否具有良好的信息价值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To quantify the potential value of new research in patients treated with thrombolytic treatment (tissue-type plasminogen activator tPA) in the 4.5- to 6.0-hour time window after stroke onset and to determine the optimal size of a future trial using value of information analysis. Methods: Expected value of partial perfect and sample information (EVPPI and EVSI) analyses were conducted using a probabilistic Markov model. Data for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distributions in patients 4.5 to 6.0 hours since stroke onset for tPA (n = 576) and placebo (n = 543) were obtained from pooled randomized controlled trials. EVSI was quantified with net monetary benefit (assuming willingness to pay for health as $100,000/QALY). We calculated discounted population-level EVSI by multiplying per person EVSI by the annual number of eligible patients with stroke in the United States and assuming a 10-year time frame of treatment use. Study costs were based on administrative costs and the costs of tPA. Results: The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that tPA was dominated by placebo in this patient group. EVPPI for mRS distributions was $1003 per person. On the basis of EVSI, the optimal sample size of a new trial collecting data on tPA efficacy in these patients would be 5600 across study arms with expected population-level societal returns (EVSI minus study costs) of $68.7 million. Conclusions: Expanding research attention to the 4.5 to 6.0-hour time window for tPA treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke is justified because the expected returns are substantial. Even a relatively large trial in which more information on treatment efficacy on the basis of mRS scores is collected would represent good value for information.
机译:研究目的: 量化在卒中发作后 4.5 至 6.0 小时时间窗口内接受溶栓治疗(组织型纤溶酶原激活剂 [tPA])治疗的患者进行新研究的潜在价值,并使用信息分析的价值确定未来试验的最佳规模。方法:采用概率马尔可夫模型对部分完美和样本信息(EVPPI和EVSI)进行期望值分析。tPA (n = 576) 和安慰剂 (n = 543) 患者卒中发作后 4.5 至 6.0 小时的改良 Rankin 量表 (mRS) 分布数据来自合并随机对照试验。EVSI以净货币收益进行量化(假设愿意支付100,000美元/QALY)。我们通过将人均EVSI乘以美国每年符合条件的卒中患者人数,并假设使用10年的时间框架来计算打折的人群水平EVSI。研究成本基于管理成本和tPA成本。结果:基本病例终生成本效益分析显示,在该患者组中,tPA以安慰剂为主。mRS 分发的 EVPPI 为每人 1003 美元。在EVSI的基础上,一项收集这些患者tPA疗效数据的新试验的最佳样本量为5600个,预期人群水平的社会回报(EVSI减去研究成本)为6870万美元。结论:将研究关注度扩大到4.5至6。急性缺血性卒中患者 tPA 治疗的 0 小时时间窗是合理的,因为预期回报可观。即使是一项相对较大的试验,其中收集了更多基于 mRS 评分的治疗效果信息,也代表了良好的信息价值。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号