...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Variation in Serious Illness Communication among Surgical Patients Receiving Palliative Care
【24h】

Variation in Serious Illness Communication among Surgical Patients Receiving Palliative Care

机译:Variation in Serious Illness Communication among Surgical Patients Receiving Palliative Care

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Natural language processing (NLP), a form of computer-assisted data abstraction, rapidly identifies serious illness communication domains such as code-status confirmation and goals of care (GOC) discussions within free-text notes, using a codebook of phrases. Differences in the phrases associated with palliative care for patients with different types of illness are unknown.Objective: To compare communication of code-status clarification and GOC discussions between patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing palliative procedures and patients admitted with life-threatening trauma.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting/Subjects: Patients with in-hospital admissions within two academic medical centers.Measurements: Sensitivity and specificity of NLP-identified communication domains compared with manual review.Results: Among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (n?=?523), NLP identified code-status clarification in 54% of admissions and GOC discussions in 49% of admissions. The sensitivity and specificity for code-status clarification were 94% and 99% respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for a GOC discussion were 93% and 100%, respectively. Using the same codebook in patients with life-threatening trauma (n?=?2093), NLP identified code-status clarification in 25.9% of admissions and GOC discussions in 6.3% of admissions. While NLP identification had 100% specificity, the sensitivity for code-status clarification and GOC discussion was reduced to 86% and 50%, respectively. Adding dynamic phrases such as “ongoing discussions” and phrases related to “family meetings” increased the sensitivity of the NLP codebook for code status to 98% and for GOC discussions to 100%.Conclusions: Communication of code status and GOC differ between patients with advanced cancer and those with life-threatening trauma. Recognition of these differences can aid in identification in patterns of palliative care delivery.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号